The Mercedes driver highlighted a lack of overtaking in the US GP
George Russell has expressed his frustration with Pirelli’s current Formula 1 tyres after a US GP that saw little overtaking.
While Lando Norris and Charles Leclerc had a spectacular fight for second place – helped by the two drivers being on different strategies – there was little action involving those who were on similar tyres.
Pirelli’s hopes of adding interest to the race with a double step between compounds in Austin didn’t pay off, with those who started on the C1 hard abandoning it early, having signalled to the rest of the pitlane that it was not a good race tyre. Everyone thus went from mediums to softs.
On the first lap Russell dropped from P4 on the grid to P6, and he remained there behind Oscar Piastri for the duration, despite having demonstrated in the Saturday sprint that he had the pace with which to challenge Max Verstappen.
“I made a good start,” said Russell when I asked about his loss of two places. “But when Max covered Lando, I thought the normal thing to do would be for him to go to the outside to protect his position. And in turn, he didn’t.
“He just stayed behind Max. He got overtaken, and it blocked me in, and then I got overtaken. So that was quite frustrating. But I had the feeling before the race, wherever you finish Turn One is where you’re going to finish. And unfortunately, this turned out to be the case.”
Russell made it clear why he couldn’t make progress after losing a couple of spots.
“I think I if I came out of Turn 1 in P4, due to Charles’s strategy, maybe I could have finished P3,” he said. “But the thing is now, when there’s no tyre degradation, there’s no tyre delta between the fastest car and the slowest car in the top six, there’s maybe two-tenths or three-tenths.
“And every track we go to, you need at least half a second to overtake, so that’s why you’re not seeing any overtakes. And I don’t even remember the last two-stop race, to be honest.”
However Russell was reluctant to blame Pirelli, acknowledging how difficult it is for the tyre supplier to tick all the boxes.
“I think Pirelli get a hard time no matter what,” he said. “If there’s lots of tyre degradation people say it’s not real, the drivers can’t push, we have to manage, we don’t like that. Then when there’s no tyre degradation, we say it’s a boring race. They don’t seem to be able to win in any case.
“So realistically, you want a tyre that you can push full gas, but it doesn’t go the whole race. If you could choose for the tyre, it’s a tyre, you go flat out, but after 15 laps, it falls off a cliff, and you have to do a two or three-stop race.
“And ideally, the soft tyre there’s 12 laps, the medium tyre does 15 laps, and the hard tyre does 20 laps, and then it falls off the cliff. But that is a lot easier said than done. As I said, Pirelli get a very hard time. They do their best. They have given us a substantially better tyre. This tyre is very good, but it causes bad racing.”
He added: “All of the races recently been one stops, and even from the sprint race yesterday, the Ferrari couldn’t overtake Carlos. Years ago, that would not have been the case. I don’t really know, but I think it’s just lack of tyre deg.”
Adam Cooper F1 