Alonso uses “a little bit of luck” to make unplanned one-stop work for Aston

Alonso used a one-stop strategy to land an eighth place

Fernando Alonso says Aston Martin’s call to stop him only once in the Belgian GP was not planned – and it needed “a little bit of luck” to work.

Alonso was one of only five drivers to stop only once, along with original race winner George Russell, Yuki Tsunoda, Kevin Magnussen and his own team mate Lance Stroll.

Alonso used the unexpected strategy to finish ninth on the road, which became eighth when Russell was disqualified for a weight infringement.

At the previous race in Hungary he was left frustrated after what he thought was an unnecessarily early first stop as the team reacted to other soft tyre starters coming in.

“We had the plans, as always, Plan B, Plan C, whatever,” said Alonso. “So we covered the one-stop and the three-stops. We were P12, and we were just waiting for a safety car, maybe to play in our hands.

“And then 11 laps in the end, we started considering, ‘Okay, safety car is not coming, but maybe we go to the end?’

“So it was just being very flexible, and lap-by-lap, judging the conditions, and at the end, it was the right call. But let’s say it was not planned just to go for one-stop.”

Like Russell Alonso was able to make it work because degradation was not as bad as had been feared, and the tyres didn’t fall off a cliff.

“I think especially with the new asphalt, you sometimes get very low deg,” he said. “Or you get graining, you can have the two things. And today was one of those days. Maybe the temperature helped, to be a little bit hotter on Sunday.

“We had a lot of graining on Friday, and we didn’t have any today, but I think no one could predict even the last five laps. If the degradation was not linear, and you have a big cliff, the strategy will not work. It’s a little bit of luck sometimes when you take these decisions.”

Alonso conceded that having track position by staying out and obliging two-stoppers to catch him helped the strategy to work, while his choice of a higher downforce level – which protected the tyres from sliding – was also key.

“It depends to the cars you’re fighting,” he said of track position. “In our case it was crucial, because the Williams and the Alpines, they were the two fastest cars [on the straights], and if you fall behind, the race is over.

“So we underestimated a little bit that, but at the end our car thanks to the extra drag and downforce, maybe was taking care of the tyres a little bit better, and made it possible to do one-stop. So it was a trade-off, and I think it was the right call for us.”

Asked to review the first half of the season Alonso admitted that it hasn’t been what he had expected.

“A little bit disappointed,” he said. “We cannot hide the fact that we are fighting today, with Williams, RB and Alpine last year, we were looking maybe to the top four teams.

“Now they are out of reach, and we are just defending from the guys behind. Even at the beginning of the year in qualifying, especially, we were always top five, top six, in the mix.

“So definitely a lot of work to do for us in the summer break, and the second part of the year. We will not give up.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Sainz frustrated as Ferrari strategy “risks” at Spa don’t pay off

Sainz admitted that Ferrari’s strategy didn’t work out at Spa

Carlos Sainz said that Ferrari didn’t get his strategy right in the Belgian GP and that the timing of his first pit stop was not ideal for either a one or two-stop option.

Sainz was the only driver at the front of the field to start on the hard tyres, and he rose from seventh on the grid to the lead as others pitted.

He came in on lap 20 but despite the long first stint he then ran a similar two-stop strategy to most of his competitors – other than George Russell, who stopped once on lap 10 on his way to victory on the road.

The Mercedes driver was subsequently disqualified, promoting Sainz from his seventh at the flag to sixth.

However the Spaniard felt he might have done better had he tried to stop once.

“I feel like we took some risks at the start, starting on the hard,” he said. “We even won a position [from Norris]. So I was very optimistic and positive about this strategy.

“We managed to extend it quite a bit to lap 20, with hindsight, not long enough, because probably one-stop seemed like a good possibility today.

“And yeah, probably the main thing is that we didn’t do a one, but we also didn’t do an optimal two, because we boxed too late for the two, or too early for the one.

“It’s easy to say now in hindsight, but I felt like the race was promising a lot more. After 20 laps, I was like, we might have a shot at the podium.

“And then suddenly I finished P7 nine seconds behind the P6, so clearly, there’s something that we will have to look at. At the same time I think our direct competitors today were quicker, so I don’t think it would have changed much.”

Expanding on what could have been done differently he said: “Starting on hards, if anything, we would have needed to commit to extending another 10 laps at least.

“On a two-stop, maybe boxing five, six laps earlier to spend as much time as possible on that hard tyre that today was performing really well.”

While team mate Charles Leclerc took pole and finished fourth on the road and third in the final results Sainz said there was no real sign of progress.

“When you see the pace of Mercedes, Red Bull and McLaren in the race, I don’t think so,” he said. “I think two or three-tenths. So yeah, we started on pole, and we still finished P4.

“With my car, I felt like we were on for a podium.  And then as soon as everyone put their hards on, you could see which pace everyone was doing, and even though my last stint, I felt very competitive and quick, then when they told me the lap times of the others, I was not quite as quick as I thought I was.”

Regarding bouncing he said: “Yeah, the quicker we go through corners, the worse it gets, so towards the end of the race, we were not on holidays!”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Vowles: “Odds are in our favour” on Williams signing Sainz

Vowles is pretty confident that Williams will get the nod from Sainz

Williams Formula 1 boss James Vowles says “the odds are in our favour” in terms of the chances of signing Carlos Sainz for 2025 and beyond.

He also indicated that an announcement could come as early as next week, before the summer break, after he drew a “line in the sand” in terms of the decision process.

Sainz has been considering his options since Ferrari announced that he would be replaced by Lewis Hamilton in 2025, with Audi, Alpine and Williams the three choices that he had been considering in recent weeks.

Management changes at the first two, plus Alpine’s plan to use customer engines from 2026, have given him extra food for thought.

Vowles is convinced that Williams is now the favourite to land him.

“More than 50%, how’s that?,” he said when asked what the chances were of securing the Spaniard.

“How confident am I? I think the odds are in our favour, but I’ve been stung by this already once this year. So let’s see.”

Regarding the possibility of a driver announcement in the coming week he said: “Tentatively, yes. I think I’ve already said before, going into summer break, yes. And I think there’s a there’s a line in the sand that I’ve created, and I hope it’s one that we remain within.”

Vowles has long stressed that Sainz is the team’s number one target, with Valtteri Bottas the likely Plan B.

“I’m open minded, but I want excellence within the team,” he said. “I want race-winning performance within the team. I want individuals that are leaders. In other words, they’re established.

“So out of all those, the top of the list, I’ve said it from the start, I’ll maintain it here now as well, is Carlos.

“In adversity last year, he won a race, and he did it in a bloody intelligent way, against some of the best individuals, that includes Lando and Charles. He beat them in the circumstances.

“I know he had a pretty poor qualifying yesterday, but look at Q1 and Q2 he’s there or thereabouts. He brings excellence along with him. And I’ve said it once, and I keep saying it, that is where my heart is set, and let’s see if the journeys collide.”

Vowles stressed that he has worked hard to convince Sainz to come on board.

“It’s interesting conversations he and I have had pretty late into a few nights, and we present it from both sides,” he said.

“My perspective is this. I know I wear Williams shirt, but I believe so much in what we’re doing. That’s why I left Mercedes to come here.

“I believe in everything we are doing here, and I’m in it day-to-day, and I can see the changes day to day.

“With Carlos, he can’t see much of that. What he looks at is what you can see externally. Where are you, where have you qualified? Why did you have a bad race here? What’s going on here?”

Vowles admitted that Audi’s offer is tempting for Sainz: “He has one of the largest OEMs in the world chasing him. That’s hard to turn down, an OEM that his father has won with.

“At the same time, he has a team [Alpine] that has, let’s be clear about it, historically, beaten us, fundamentally, and again, that becomes hard to turn down. They won races not that long ago, or won a race not that long ago [Hungary 2021].

“But irrespective, I can see that perspective on things. Here’s what he told me, which actually resonated the most – ‘the reason why I’m doing this is when I commit, I need to commit with all my heart, and all my soul, 100% and to do that means I can’t have any doubts.’ And that’s why it’s taking the time. And that resonated with me a lot.”

Expanding on Sainz’s decision process he said: “He’s a very sensible chap. Whatever happens with Audi, they are an OEM, they’ll pour what is required financially into this to make it successful. 

“And I think change there? I’m not sure if it’s good or bad. I’m not enough in the team to be able to know it, but I don’t think that’s necessarily resonating.

“Remember, he’s looking at the long term, what’s the right long term solution, and with Alpine, they’ll take an amount of pain, and then they’ll have an amount of success from it as well.

“At the same time, I think he’s trying, as you all are as well, to weigh up what the options are. I’m biased.

“We’re a stable management here. We have no changes ongoing, and we have a hell of a lot of investment in the background. This is why, for me, it’s an easy decision for him.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Ocon and Gasly opt for different wings as Alpine splits cars at Spa

Gasly is running more downforce than Ocon at Spa

Alpine Formula 1 drivers Esteban Ocon and Pierre Gasly have gone in very different directions on downforce levels for the Belgian GP – and it didn’t work out as expected in Saturday’s wet qualifying.

As part of a general package of updates the Enstone team brought a new low drag wing to Spa.

It was tried for the first time in FP2, and while Ocon preferred to stick with it for qualifying and the race, Gasly went back to a high downforce version.

He should thus in theory have had the advantage in the wet qualifying session, and indeed he was an impressive second in Q1.

However he slipped back to 12th in Q2 while Ocon progressed to Q3 and earned what became ninth place on the grid after Max Verstappen’s penalty was applied.

“A good afternoon for us,” said Ocon when asked by this writer about his session. “I think we optimised well the car potential today. Unfortunately, we didn’t have any new sets for Q3, which hurt us a little bit.

“We decided to stick on a dry setup, to have little bit more straight-line performance. That’s why we were very quick in sector one. And we decided to split across cars, which is never an easy decision as well. But to me, it was quite important, the race aspect of things.

“And if it’s dry tomorrow, touching wood, we can hopefully look ahead and have some good opportunity, more than looking behind, looking to fall back, really.

“On the dry it was clear that it was the better option. Obviously, on the wet, it should be quicker, the higher downforce. But yeah, today we’ve maximised the potential we had. And even with the light car in sector two, we were quite strong in general.”

Ocon noted that as qualifying went on he was able to understand how best to make use of his low-drag configuration.

“Pierre in Q1 was a good, four or five tenths quicker,” he said. “I kind of thought that’s how we are going to qualify, basically, it was quite clear.

“But somehow after a couple of runs I managed to figure out where I could gain from that low downforce and use the potential of it. And it turned out to work alright in the end.”

He added: “I think we were on the max downforce in Budapest, and we killed the tyres. So we go the other way.”

Meanwhile Gasly remains hopeful that his wing choice will prove beneficial in Sunday’s race.

“On my car we decided to go with more downforce,” he said. “So a different approach between the two cars. We’ll see if it pays off tomorrow in the race. But we’re quite confident that it matched what we expect in terms of gains with this new package.

“We know it can be a long race here. It’s going to be hot tomorrow. It was between the one and two stop before, and we seemed quite good on the tyre. So we’ll have to see what we can do.

“But I think we’re going to be in the fight for P10, P9 with these guys ahead of us. So that’s where our race will be.”

Gasly admitted that things went wrong for him as qualifying progressed and he had issues with tyre temperatures.

“Q1 was really good,” he said. “The car felt great, and the track obviously dried up a bit. And I just think we got it wrong with our out-laps, going faster in the out-laps, and my tyres were cooked every time in my push laps.

“So just from a very strong balance and potential in Q1 the car just felt very different in Q2. I’m doing the same lap time when the track’s drier, and it’s just quite disappointing because there was obviously good potential. But that’s the difference between a Q3 and Q2.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Wet qualifying helps Hamilton as Mercedes abandons new floor

Hamilton believes that a wet qualifying session flattered Mercedes

Lewis Hamilton says that an overnight change to an older spec floor has improved the Mercedes W15 at Spa – but he admits that it was only the wet conditions that allowed him to qualify fourth.

Hamilton was unhappy after Friday’s running with the latest update package, and he was only 10th fastest in FP2.

Prior to the uncertainty of the wet Saturday running the team opted to switch both Hamilton and team mate George Russell back to the floor used until Hungary to provide a stable baseline.

It paid off in wet qualifying as Hamilton took fourth and Russell seventh, with both men also set to gain a place from a grid penalty for Max Verstappen.

“If it was drying I’d be struggling to be in top 10, I would imagine,” he said. “And then I think just out there timing was everything, getting out on track at the right point.

“I think we were a little bit too early at the end, we were first out, and that was when we used our new tyres. And then we didn’t have any new tyres towards the end, when the three guys ahead did. So a bit unfortunate in that respect. But I’m grateful to be up there.

“I’m okay with being on the second row, for sure. It’s close enough. I think today, if we got everything perfect, we could have been on the front row, or even first, but it wasn’t meant to be.”

Hamilton admitted that the car was difficult to drive with the update package as used on Friday.

“Our car is not really feeling strong this weekend,” he said. “Yesterday, we were a second off. I’m hoping it’s not the case tomorrow. But it was a real struggle yesterday.

“We made changes overnight, so I’m hoping we’ll be in a better position. But even with the changes, we’re not on par with McLaren. They’re much faster, and the Red Bulls.”

However he admitted that the rain made it hard to properly assess those changes: “It’s impossible to say today, because we didn’t drive yesterday’s car in the rain, but I’m pretty sure it will be better than what we had yesterday.

“It couldn’t get much worse than that! So it will be better, but how much better? I don’t know.”

Regarding the changes Mercedes trackside engineering director Andrew Shovlin confirmed that there were also mechanical set-up changes as well as the floor.

“We weren’t happy with the balance or pace of the car yesterday, so we made some fairly major changes to the mechanical and aero specification of the car overnight,” he said. We’d hoped for a dry window in FP3 to evaluate those, but unfortunately it stayed wet throughout and there was no chance to accumulate any meaningful running.
 
“Wet qualifying sessions are difficult at present as the grid is tight. You need to time your new sets to coincide with when the track is at its quickest. By Q3, we were down to one new set of Intermediates. We’d decided to carry more fuel and do multiple laps to try and land one with the driest conditions. That was similar to McLaren. We lost out to the Ferrari of Leclerc though who used his new set right at the end. Had we not been carrying the fuel, we would have had the pace for P2.
 
“We don’t know where we will stack up on race pace, as the car is quite different to the one we ran in the dry yesterday. Starting from P3 and P6 though, we are hopefully well placed to fight for a podium.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Norris: Verstappen “definitely a threat” to McLaren from 11th on Spa grid

Norris believes that McLaren will have to fight off Verstappen in Sunday’s race

Lando Norris says that Max Verstappen is still a threat for victory in the Belgian GP despite starting only 11th after taking a PU grid penalty.

He added that Verstappen’s qualifying pace indicated that McLaren still has work to do despite the Woking team’s recent strong form.

Norris and team mate Oscar Piastri are starting fourth and fifth after the wet qualifying session, but they are expected to be competitive relative to the cars ahead – those of Charles Leclerc, Sergio Perez and Lewis Hamilton – in what will be a dry race on Sunday.

However Norris concedes that Verstappen is likely to come through the field and provide the biggest challenge to the Woking team.

“Definitely a threat,” said Norris when asked about Verstappen’s chances of winning. “I think he’s clearly been quickest all weekend, even yesterday in FP2, they just didn’t turn up the engine, and we had. So considering we were only two-tenths ahead, they had a lot more in their bag, basically.

“So yes, in a way, a good thing, it shows that we still have a lot more work to do, even after a lot of great races the past few weeks, I think Red Bull have always been there thereabouts.

“People want to try and count them out at times, but Max was easily on par with us in quali last weekend, and pretty much the same race pace, just made more mistakes than what we did, simple as that, but just as quick.

“At the minute, they look very strong. He has been since the first lap in FP1, he was quite easily the strongest, so going to be a threat tomorrow.

“But that’s low fuel, and hopefully high fuel is a little bit more even, but 100% he’s going to be coming through quickly, and I’m sure he’ll be a threat for us at some point.”

Norris said he wasn’t worried about Sergio Perez potentially holding the McLarens up and allowing Verstappen to close.

“I wouldn’t say it’s a concern, honestly,” he said. “For our race against Max, we have to get past all of them. I know Checo potentially will have bit more defensive mindset than the others, but Charles is still fighting off pole and for a win, so he’s going to be fighting hard for it.

“He’s not just going to let things go easily. Same with Hamilton. He’s always going to be aggressive and defensive what he needs to be.

“So I wouldn’t say Perez is any more of a threat from that side, but he’s in the quickest car, so in terms of getting past that, kind of making the tyres last better than him, and that kind of thing is going to be harder than some of the others.

“I think when you look at the pace from Friday, it gives us decent amount of confidence that if we can just keep our heads down and focus on ourselves we can hopefully get through them at some point in the race. And try and keep Max behind.”

Piastri suggested that a big delta between old and new tyres means that it won’t be hard to overtake.

“I pitted at one point in practice, and I was three seconds a lap faster than the car ahead of me,” said the Australian.

“So if you manage to defend and the car behind is three seconds quicker than you, then that’s pretty impressive!

“So I think it will kind of work itself out naturally, let’s say, depending on how the race goes. But obviously we’re in a fight with Red Bull in the constructors’, and Max is leading the world championship in the driver’s standing.

“So of course, I’m expecting Checo to put up a fight. I think even for his own sake, it’s not been the easiest run for him.

“And I think, of course, more than anyone, he probably wants a really good result for himself. So I think he’ll fight hard for it, but I don’t think any harder than he would if was another situation.”

Piastri says that Red Bull has been more competitive in recent races that many people might think.

“I think we definitely do still have some different characteristics,” he said. “I think in my opinion, Budapest is really the only weekend for us where you can clearly say we were the quickest.

“And even in saying that, I think had Max got through the traffic a bit quicker in the race, he would have posed a serious threat at the end. So I think they were still, very competitive, and qualifying obviously it was very close.”

Piastri says that “little things” have helped to determine the pecking order: “I think just some days we’ve made mistakes. Some days Red Bull have made mistakes.

“Last weekend, I think our car probably favoured that track a little bit more. This weekend it probably favours Red Bull a little bit more. So all these little things put together is what’s making the difference at the moment.

“And I think we just need to try and make sure we maximise the ones that are in our control, really. But I don’t think we’ve necessarily had the edge over them for the last five or six races.

“I think it’s fair to say we’ve been very even, but I don’t think we’re quicker week in, week out. I think again, Budapest is really the only one where I think we did have a bit of an edge.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Alonso: Higher downforce is key for “into the unknown” Spa race

Fernando Alonso believes he has the right package for Sunday’s race

Fernando Alonso believes that the Belgian GP will be a step “into the unknown” for all teams and drivers given the limited preparation time.

Having qualified ninth the Spaniard is hoping that a higher downforce level than some of Aston Martin’s immediate rivals will prove beneficial in terms of tyre usage during the race, due to less sliding.

Rain on Saturday meant that teams only had Friday to prepare for what is expected to be hot and dry race on Sunday, with a new track surface making it hard to judge how tyres will behave over the full distance.

“We go into the race into the unknown I think for everybody,” said Alonso. “We had a little bit of long runs yesterday, but in this track, being so long the lap, you cannot do more than six or seven laps, because of time restrictions on the sessions.

“So with the new asphalt, it’s very grippy, but we don’t know exactly the degradation tomorrow.

“The good thing is that with a wet qualifying, we have all the dry tyres available for everybody, so we should be able to push all the way through.”

Asked who his competition will be in the race he said: “Not the cars in front, unfortunately! But I think we will have to see behind us. It’s going to be a challenging race in terms of tyre degradation, some nice battles for sure.

“I think we have the Alpines very fast this weekend. We have, I think, Albon as well, very fast. So, yeah, I think that will be our battle.

“They are a little a bit quicker on the straights. We have a little bit more downforce in the car, maybe we take care better on the tyres. So hopefully that comes to us at the end of the race.”

Alonso, who will gain a place on the grid thanks to a PU penalty for Max Verstappen, believes that he couldn’t have done better in qualifying, indicating that it was the best he felt in the car all weekend.

“P9 behind the top four teams probably was the maximum today,” he said. “So happy with that. The car felt good in qualifying. I struggled a little bit the rest of the three practices this weekend. I was never confident in the car. I needed three or four laps to get the rhythm into the session.

“So finally now in qualifying I was flat out since lap 1, and yeah, that extra confidence, it was very important in these kinds of conditions.”

Regarding the latest updates he added: “We’ve been experimenting with the setup yesterday as well. So yeah, the new upgrades are a little bit more optimised.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

How GM and Cadillac can solve Renault’s Viry F1 problem

Alpine is set to align with Mercedes in 2026 – but could the Viry PU become a Cadillac?

On Friday Alpine’s outgoing Formula 1 team principal Bruno Famin confirmed that the Enstone outfit is planning to use a customer power unit in 2026, thus abandoning the in-house project that has been underway at Renault’s Viry-Chatillon base for the past couple of years.

He also stressed that the customer plan is pending agreement with the unions and French authorities, and a guarantee that the Viry employees will still have a job.

Famin talked in somewhat vague terms about the facility’s resources and the 250-300 people who work on F1 being reallocated to Alpine’s road car programme.

However there is a far more straightforward solution to the Viry problem, and one which will potentially actually earn the Renault Group a lot of money – sell the 2026 project to General Motors and create a Cadillac PU that could put Andretti on the grid.

As is well known Andretti’s original strategy was to be a Renault customer in 2026-’27, and then bring its own US-built Cadillac PU onstream in 2028.

Those plans remain in limbo given that F1 steadfastly refuses to approve Andretti’s entry.

In the rejection letter it sent on January 31 F1 specifically cited the customer engine plan as one of the key reasons, seemingly ignoring the fact that McLaren, Aston Martin, Williams, Haas and Sauber are all currently customer teams.

However the last paragraph appeared to leave the door open: “We would look differently on an application for the entry of a team into the 2028 Championship with a GM power unit, either as a GM works team or as a GM customer team designing all allowable components in-house.

“In this case there would be additional factors to consider in respect of the value that the applicant would bring to the championship, in particular in respect of bringing a prestigious new OEM to the sport as a PU supplier.”

This was written on the basis that, as per the plans submitted by Andretti, the Cadillac PU would not be ready until 2028. However, it was perhaps not as generous a concession as it might appear.

The entry process that Andretti took part in and which was approved on the FIA side was for 2025, 2026 or 2027. In other words an entry for 2028 would require a whole new process, and there’s no guarantee that Andretti would get past the FIA stage. It would also require the team to spend ‘25, ‘26 and ‘27 on the sidelines, spending a huge amount on salaries with no reward.

But what if Andretti could turn up with a Cadillac PU in 2026, or even 2027 if it takes more time to put the pieces together – in other words within the currently approved FIA entry window?

Renault has a PU project that has been full steam ahead for a couple of years and which is about to be canned, along with all the hybrid V6 knowledge gained since 2014. The IP of the 2026 project will be worth absolutely nothing – all that investment and no return.

Alpine may not want to use the Viry PU, but in theory there’s no reason why someone else can’t take over the project.

Renault could retain ownership of the Viry facility and simply provide IP and services to GM, in so doing creating a useful income stream that keeps the place running and still able to do other Alpine racing and road car work.

GM using Viry to create an F1 PU is little different to Ford doing it via Red Bull Powertrains, but to add some legitimacy it could bolster the French staff with a few US engineers, or perhaps undertake specific projects – as it is doing with the Andretti chassis – at its American facility. All of which would of course have to be done within the restrictions of the new PU financial regulations.

If it happened Cadillac could have a PU two years earlier than planned, the Viry operation could continue with barely a blip, and the Renault shareholders would surely welcome the funding that will be pumped in. And F1 will still have six PU manufacturers in 2026.

It all makes so much sense in theory. However, the reality is that the political complications will be hard to overcome. Renault boss Luca de Meo would have to be keen to make it happen, and any deal would have to be discussed at CEO level with his GM/Cadillac counterparts.

And given that Flavio Briatore is his advisor, the former Benetton boss would also have to have good reasons to support a GM deal.

It’s widely believed that Briatore’s longer term goal on De Meo’s behalf is to increase the value of the Enstone team in preparation for an eventual sale. Many observers believe that taking a Mercedes PU in 2026 is seen as a simple shortcut to better results, which will in turn boost the value of the team.

Thus helping Andretti to get on the grid, diluting the prize fund and potentially reducing the value of all 10 current teams, would not be in De Meo’s interests. In addition he is close to F1 boss Stefano Domenicali, who strongly opposes the Andretti entry, and it makes little sense to rock the boat. Indeed sources suggest that De Meo is not been keen to help Andretti in any way.

Has a Cadillac/Viry deal already been discussed by GM and Renault? Given that it has been several weeks since the first stories of the Alpine customer PU plan emerged, potentially leaving Andretti without an engine for 2026 and ’27, it would be naïve to think that there hasn’t already been a conversation, and Halfway house scenarios such a sale of specific IP to fast track a full US Cadillac project, for example battery technology, may also be on the table. How far any such talks have got is another story.

The clock is already ticking in terms of an Andretti entry in 2026, and also in terms of key Viry staff sticking around rather than jumping ship to Audi or Red Bull, the obvious destinations.

The question now is what can GM and Andretti do to convince De Meo and Renault to play ball?

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Next Alpine F1 upgrade package will be basis of 2025 car, says Sanchez

Alpine has a big package at Spa – but the next one is more significant

Alpine Formula 1 executive technical director David Sanchez says an update package due after the summer break will form the basis of the team’s 2025 machine.

The team introduced a new package at Spa on Friday, which includes a revised front wing, beam wing, rear wing, engine cover, and rear brake ducts.

Sanchez says the next package will be an “extension” of this one and will lead into next year’s car.

All teams are planning to carry over a lot of their 2024 cars into next season, the last with the current regulations, as they start to switch resources to their 2026 projects.

The Spa package includes a low-drag rear wing, but it wasn’t used in initial running in FP1.

“So from what you see today, all the changes are full season upgrades I would say, non-track specific,” said Sanchez. “It’s only a new rear wing, which is not on the car for now, which is track specific. The rest, which is a front wing evolution, bodywork, rear brake duct, is for everywhere.

“So the wing which we may try, depending on conditions, is the one which we may race here, in Monza, and in Vegas.”

Asked if the Spa updates had been brought forward he said: “I wouldn’t say it’s been fast-tracked. But for sure, it’s been pushed very hard through the system.”

Unsurprisingly Sanchez said that the priority is chasing downforce.

“I think the number one problem is for everyone finding more downforce, and trying to design out some anomalies which we may see with the current car,” he said. “So this package is intended primarily for more downforce.

“So this is a first step in the pipeline. We have another one which will be more big, and that will be the basis for next year. So we will do more on this year’s car.

“We’ve been working on this one [for Spa] since day one. The other one is an extension, using a bit more time to go further.”

Regarding the time of that package he said: “A few races after the break.”

Having been at Enstone since May and had time to assess its facilities Sanchez remains confident that Alpine has the potential to make progress.

“From an infrastructure point of view the team was already well advanced with the plans,” he said when asked by this writer what he had found.

“We looked together, whether we needed to prioritise a few items more than others. I think where we are now, the plan we have, if I look at ’26 and beyond, we should be in a good position.

“Now, it’s more to get everything in the right direction with this car and the next one, and build more confidence in the team.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Alonso: Aston Martin F1 team “more calm” after Hungary upgrade boost

Alonso says that the AMR24 upgrades worked well in Hungary

Fernando Alonso says that his Aston Martin Formula 1 team is “a little bit more calm” after the upgrades introduced for the AMR24 worked successfully.

This season the Silverstone team has struggled to get performance out of the car, and earlier upgrades haven’t always worked as planned.

Despite the fact that the team came away from Budapest with only a humble 10th place for Lance Stroll Alonso says that the new parts made a difference.

“I think we are quite happy with how the new package worked in Hungary,” he said. “It’s doing what the wind tunnel was saying.

“And we had a very good correlation, which was very important, after a few other upgrades were a little bit more up and down.

“So I think the team is quite happy with Budapest. Not forgetting that this is only the first step, and we are still long way off where we want to be.

“But now that it seems that we found a path, and we see on track what we see on the wind tunnel, maybe it’s easier for us to add downforce now, without any scare of not seeing it on track.”

Underlining that he now expects upgrades to work well from now on Alonso noted: “We are a little bit more calm after the Budapest upgrade in terms of what is coming for the future, or what will come in the future.

“Maybe the team has now a better understanding of where to put performance, with the safety that it will add lap time, and it will make the car faster. So this was a key upgrade for us, I think, and it worked as expected. So it gives us more confidence, for sure.”

Alonso says the progress made by rival teams has shown Aston Martin that a package can be improved.

“Mercedes this year and McLaren last year, both of them they proved that it’s possible to recover a significant gap to the leaders,” he said.

“Mercedes was fighting with us for four races, and now they won two Grand Prix. McLaren was out of Q1 for few races at the beginning of last year, and they were fighting for victory. So it is possible.

“It’s up to us, it’s up to the team to understand the upgrades. Where are the key parts of the car to find performance? How to find that performance? We have the facilities. We will have the wind tunnel at the end of the year.”

In the short-term Alonso expects the AMR24 to be competitive in Belgium this weekend.

“I don’t see any reason why not,” he said. “I think Budapest probably was, at least on our expectations, a little bit more difficult. Maybe Spa is a little bit better for our package.

“But we changed the car so much in Hungary that we come here with some extra tests to do, after all the learnings of Budapest. So I think FP1, FP2, we still have to dedicate them to test the new package. And let’s see where we are.”

He added: “We have a lot of test ideas to maximise the package. But also the weather is not looking great for tomorrow, so maybe we don’t have that possibility.

“It will be gold if it’s dry, because I think we can optimise a little bit the car, and then we need to be in the points. Both cars in the points, both cars in Q3, that’s the clear target.”

Alonso made an interesting observation about why it’s so hard for teams to optimise their cars under the current regulations.

“The pursuit of adding downforce the car is more fragile, and more peaky on everything that you do,” he said. “Obviously one thing is testing cars on the wind tunnel, on ideal and consistent conditions.

“And on a racetrack, here in Spa you go at 60km/h in Turn 1, you go at 300 in Tune 10-11. The last corner, it goes uphill, I think, 8%.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized