Tag Archives: FIA

Why Sainz Jr believes his father is the right man for the FIA

Sainz Jr backs his father for the FIA job

The news that Carlos Sainz Sr is contemplating a run for the FIA presidency has created quite a stir, mainly because the 63-year-old is such an obvious potential candidate.

Universally respected, he brings with him the knowledge and experience gained not just during his own sporting career, but also from nurturing and guiding that of his son Carlos Jr.

At the moment it remains just an idea, and the former World Champion is clearly gauging the interest. However it would be naïve to think that he hasn’t already attracted useful support from around the world of motor sport, and potentially from senior FIA folk.

What matters of course is getting support from within the wider body of the FIA and the voting members, and it remains to be seen how that develops in the coming months, given that Mohammed Ben Sulayem scored such a convincing victory back in 2021.

Sainz will also have to come up with a full team, including deputy presidents for sport and mobility, and a head of senate.

The bottom line is that a challenge to the incumbent is a healthy thing and a good test of the democratic process in any field – may the best candidate win, and so on.

On Thursday in Imola Carlos Sainz Jr gave an intriguing insight into his father’s mindset, while stressing that the inspiration for him to stand came from elsewhere.

“Obviously we’ve been talking about it for a while now,” he said. “Interestingly enough, I think it’s something that didn’t actually come from him.

“A lot of people in the paddock were kind of putting it in his head, and little-by-little, he started considering it, and now he’s obviously thinking about it.

“I think the key is that he’s still hasn’t put together a team. But he’s considering it, and depending obviously how he sees it and sees his fit, he will go for it or not.”

So is he the right man for the job? Carlos Jr cites his dad’s vast experience of all forms motor sport.

“I’m his son, so I’m biased!,” he said. “But I just honestly speaking from the most objective position possible, it doesn’t come to my head anyone that has lived through all the karting days with his son, and knows the roots of motor sport in go-karting, as he did four or five years of go-karting with me.

“He did four or five years of single-seaters with me, knowing how tough, expensive, difficult is that ladder. He’s done 10 years in F1 with me. He’s done 40 years of rallying, raids. He does a lot of mobility work in Spain.

“So a guy that covers so many experiences in so many different areas of motor sport, coming to the end of his career, obviously, in racing, and trying to find a way to give back to motorsports what motorsports has given to him.

“From the most objective position that I can find, obviously being his son and obviously a very optimal candidate. Whether he will decide to do it or not is obviously completely up to him.

“But interestingly enough, as I said, it didn’t actually come from him, it came from a lot of people in the paddock putting it on his ear. And he started, maybe? It’s actually not so much from him, but people coming to him and suggesting it.”

So how likely is the bid to come to fruition?

“I can just tell you that he’s considering it seriously,” says Carlos. “Like he said, he’s evaluating all the options, obviously, now starting to think what team, what people, individuals, he would like to have in his team. He’s trying to understand how the elections work, how much convincing, how many people he needs to obviously go and talk to.

“But he’s evaluating the whole thing, and trying to understand how everything works. It’s his thing now. I’m obviously very busy here with Williams, doing my own thing, so I’m leaving it to him, in a way, and he gives me an update of the situation every one or two weeks, how much progress he’s doing, or what’s the situation. And he obviously wants my opinion, but not more than that.”

It’s not an easy job, and inevitably you can’t please everybody. Does Sr have a thick enough skin to cope with the challenges and criticism he’ll face?

“He seems more up for it in a way, where he has a thick enough skin to deal with it,” says Sainz Jr.

“My mum, maybe not so much! She’s like, come on, now that you are about to retire, give yourself a break, or do something not so demanding as this. But my dad is just non-stop.

“He loves motor sport, he loves racing, and he sees there an opportunity to put an end to his racing career, but still do something further, still actively, and find ways to give back to motorsport, and give back to the FIA, an entity that he has a lot of respect for, for all his years.

“And he knows what the FIA has done over the last 20-30 years, to improve safety in motorsport, to improve everyone’s life here in in motorsports. So he feels like he could give back, and that motivates him.”

Inevitably people will question how a serving FIA president could have a son racing in the organisation’s flagship championship.

However it’s inevitable that any credible candidate with relevant experience will have connections of some sort with teams, manufacturers and drivers.

When Jean Todt was president his son Nicolas was an active driver manager and team co-owner, and that wasn’t seen as a conflict. Carlos Jr is confident that it won’t be an issue.

“I’ve been trying to think scenarios where it could, but I actually don’t see any way how that could be seen,” he says. “If anything, obviously, he will be extremely careful. I will be extremely careful, because the last thing that I want is my or his image or career to be damaged by that situation.

“So if anything, we would do the opposite effect, and I don’t see any conflict of interest the moment you personally know my dad or you personally know me. We are honest people that would never, ever compromise that situation in motorsport.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Domenicali: “Update to formalise” 2026 Cadillac F1 entry due soon

The former Andretti team has been expanding rapidly at its Silverstone base

Formula 1 CEO Stefano Domenicali says Cadillac will provide an “incredible boost to the ecosystem” of the sport – and he says that an update on formalising the team’s entry for 2026 is due soon.

It was announced in November that the team had reached an agreement in principle with Formula 1 regarding its entry plans.

That came after founder Michael Andretti was distanced from the project, and it was confirmed as a full works GM-backed team under the Cadillac name.

However formal confirmation of the entry has not been forthcoming. There appears to be no real precedent to follow in terms of the timeline and exactly what the next steps are, especially given that the next Concorde Agreement has not been finalised.

The team will use Ferrari power units initially, before eventually switching to its own in-house design.

“We always said that Cadillac is giving and will give an incredible boost to the ecosystem of F1,” said Domenicali when asked why his organisation’s position on the entry changed late last year.

“We were referring to other situations that were handled before. But now the picture is totally different.

“Cadillac is preparing the entry, in terms of preparing the season, because it would not be an easy situation for them to be in such a high-tech and evolved sporting platform, they are doing everything in order to show how Cadillac is really evolving into the sport.

“Now there is the formality that is related to the process that it’s almost ready together with the FIA. There has to be an update. And whenever this will be ready, it should be not too long, there will be a sort of an update to formalise what basically is already happening.

“So they will be ready to fight against or together with the other teams for next year. And that is the evolution that, as you know, GM has taken as a fact that they want to be a real constructor or a manufacturer that will invest in our sport, because they do believe in the technological platform that F1 can provide to their system.

“So very, very happy that now this is on-board moving forward and looking forward to see them on the track together with the other teams to fight for a great championship.”

Domenicali insisted that the arrival of Cadillac has no impact on the debate with the teams over the next Concorde, while stressing that the new entrant will have the same rights as incumbents.

“There’s no impact at all with the current discussion of Concorde Agreement,” he said. “As you know, Concorde is done by two major elements. One is the financial one that is related to the commercialisation and the marketing side of it, that discussion is between us and the teams, and we are in a good position on that.

“The other topic, or the other part of it, is the governance that, of course, we need to work together with the FIA and the teams and on that we are working.

“As you know, there’s no time pressure on that, because we are all working as partners, and we want to find the best solution for the sport. And this is something that we’re going to do, even with one more team together into the future, because of course Cadillac will be part of it and will have a voice, as the others, into the future.

“With regard to the fact that Cadillac will bring a new US ‘branch,’ I think that we can bring opportunities. And I’m totally positive, because the sport is growing in such a magnitude that everyone will exploit the best out of it. And I’m sure that the Cadillac/GM group will benefit from being part of this group.”

PS: If you’re interested in an F1 news service for your website please contact me!

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

USGP track invasion verdict tweaked after right of review

Fans showed enthusiasm at COTA – but some got onto the track too early

The FIA stewards’ decision on the post-race track invasion at the US GP has been changed after a right of review hearing.

However, the promoter remains guilty of one of the two original offences, and thus the $500,000 penalty remains in place.

In effect the judgement will serve as a reminder to venues around the world that they have to remain on top of crowd control issues.

The hearing took place earlier this month, although the full decision has only just been officially published by the FIA.

In the original verdict the stewards noted that “a large group of spectators, estimated at approximately 200 people, in the grandstand alongside pit straight, climbed a small fence and dropped around two metres to the ground between the grandstand and the track debris fencing.

“They then went under the debris fencing and climbed over the trackside wall (approximately one metre high) and then merged onto the main straight. All this occurred whilst the competing cars were still on track completing their cool down lap after the chequered flag.”

The venue was deemed to have been guilty of breaching an International Sporting Code article with a “failure to take reasonable measures thus resulting in an unsafe condition”, and in addition to have broken the F1 sporting regulation that “no one is allowed on the track” until “the last car enters the parc ferme.”

The promoter was fined $500,000, with $350,000 suspended until the end of 2026 pending a repeat at any FIA-sanctioned event.

COTA and sporting organiser US Race Management subsequently requested a right of review, which was heard on Monday.

In essence they presented evidence that they had indeed taken “reasonable measures”. Some elements were accepted as new, relevant and significant evidence, which allowed the review hearing to go ahead.

The stewards duly accepted that suitable measures had been taken, and thus the “failure to take reasonable measures thus resulting in an unsafe condition” element of the original verdict was set aside.

However, they noted that “notwithstanding the above, the incursion did occur”, and that “the illegal misconduct by a number of spectators was a significant contributor to this incident.”

Thus the original verdict remained in place in respect of the breach of the sporting regulations that determines that that “no one is allowed on the track” until “the last car enters the parc ferme.”

The original $500,000 fine, including the $350,000 suspended portion, remains in place.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Russell: No FIA reply so far to GPDA statement

Russell says that the FIA hasn’t yet replied to the GPDA statement

GPDA director George Russell says that the FIA has not responded to a statement that the organisation recently issued under the heading “driver misconduct.”

The statement focussed on the FIA’s reaction to issues such as swearing in press conferences, and the drivers’ interactions with President Mohammed ben Sulayem.

It also followed up on earlier queries regarding how fines collected by the FIA are spent.

“I think everybody felt with certain things that have happened over the course of this year that we wanted to sort of stand united,” said Russell.

“At the end of the day, we just want to be transparent with the FIA, and have this dialogue that is happening, and I think the departure of Niels [Wittich] is also a prime example of not being a part of these conversations.

“And ultimately, we only we want to work with the FIA to make the best for the sport that we all love.

“So, I think it’s kind of us now putting the pressure back on them to work with us and work with everyone, including F1 as well, just to maximise this opportunity, which F1 is in at the moment, which is an amazing time to be a part of.”

Asked if there had been a response from the FIA he said: “No. Not at the moment, which I’m a little bit surprised about, to be fair. But maybe there’ll be something to come. Who knows?”

Russell indicated that the drivers felt that going public was the best way to get their message across.

“I think we’ve probably learned from the past that whenever we have spoken up, let’s say internally, it hasn’t gone anywhere,” he admitted. “And as I said, as drivers, we only want the best for the sport.

“We want to improve it, especially on safety grounds, but whenever it comes to, you know, decisions in the race, we only want to help. And it’s been a couple of years now that not much has changed when we have sort of given some views forward.

“And I guess we all wanted to show that we are collectively united. And maybe that will show how seriously we feel as a whole on the subject.”

Regarding the Wittich firing Russell confirmed that the drivers hadn’t been informed before the media announcement.

“We definitely weren’t aware,” he said. “It was a bit of a surprise, I think, for everybody. And it’s a hell of a lot of pressure now onto the new race director. Just three races left.

“Often as drivers, we probably feel like we’re the last to find out this sort of information. And when it involves us kind of directly, it would be nice to be kept in the loop and just have an understanding of what decisions are being made.

“So, yeah, time will tell. I’m sure the new guy will handle the position just fine, but definitely not an easy race for a new race director.

Russell stressed that despite some dissatisfaction with decisions made by Wittich the drivers didn’t necessarily want to see him replaced.

“I can only talk on behalf of myself here as opposed to any of the other drivers, but I think there’s no secret that some were not happy with what was going on in terms of the decisions that were being made,” he said. 

“But at the end of the day, I think if they worked together with us, that we could have helped improve the matter.

“And I think sometimes just hiring and firing is not the solution. You kind of need to work together to improve the problem. So, let’s see what this new era is going to bring, but every time there is a change, you have to take one step back before you make the two steps forwards.”

Russell also said there has been no word from the FIA regarding the GPDA’s enquiry about where the money collected in fines is spent.

“I think ultimately for us, when we were hearing from the FIA a couple of years ago, when it came to the Presidential elections, they were talking about transparency, talking about where the money is going to be reinvested into grassroots racing, which we’re all in favour for,” he said.

“And of course, when it comes to some of these large fines, there’s a number of drivers on the grid who can comfortably afford these fines. There’s maybe some rookies on the grid that if they’re handed a $1 million fine, you know, they can’t afford this.

“But if we know where that’s being sort of reinvested and if it’s going into grassroots or into some training programs, then we get it. As I said, I think we just want the transparency and understanding of what was promised from the beginning.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

FIA’s first CEO Robyn leaves organisation

Natalie Robyn has left the FIA CEO role after just 18 months

The FIA’s first ever CEO Natalie Robyn is leaving the organisation after just 18 months in the job.

She will leave the FIA at the end of this month by “mutual agreement”, and a process to find a replacement has already begun.

The CEO role was created by created by president Mohammed Ben Sulayem as part of a modernisation process.

Robyn was named in the job in September 2022, and officially started that November.

She had previously worked in senior roles in Daimler, Nissan and Volvo, and was heading the Swiss division of the last named company before moving to the FIA.

“Performing in the role of CEO at the FIA has been an enormous privilege and I am grateful to have directed a programme of restructuring and reform,” said Robyn.

“Now is the time to step away in the knowledge that the organisation is better placed for the challenges which lie ahead.

“I take great pride in my role in advancing the FIA’s transformation across both Sport and Mobility, and I am pleased to leave an organisation comprised of a wonderful team of talented and dedicated individuals.”

Confirming her departure the FIA noted: “Throughout the past 18 months, Natalie has spearheaded a comprehensive overhaul of the federation’s operational structure, playing a pivotal role in modernising the FIA, enhancing governance, and securing sustainable financial stability.

“Natalie’s appointment to the role of CEO in November 2022 marked a milestone, leveraging her 18-year career encompassing roles within both the automotive and finance sectors.

“Her decision to pursue opportunities outside of the FIA has prompted her departure from the organisation by mutual agreement, effective at the end of May.”

Ben Sulayem said: “Natalie’s appointment was notable as the first CEO in the history of the FIA. She has contributed greatly to a wide-ranging reorganisation of our operational and management structure. On behalf of the FIA, I wish her well in her future endeavours.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

FIA confirms start clampdown with restrictions for Belgian GP

The FIA has tonight informed the F1 teams of new procedures with regard to starts from the Belgian GP onwards, as mandated by the recent Strategy Group meeting.

The basic idea is to stop drivers being fed information on clutch bite points in the build-up to the start.

The governing body has says it wants to ensure that Article 20.1 of the F1 Sporting Regulations, which says that “the driver must drive the car alone and unaided,” is respected. That rule will enforced more rigorously with “the aim of ensuring that drivers will be solely responsible for preparing for race starts.”

Technical directive TD/017-15, titled “Start Practice and Start Procedures,” reveals that the FIA will address the matter of the adjustment of bite points from both a technical perspective, and via the expected clampdown on radio traffic.

From now on the clutch bite point may not be changed from the time the car leaves the garage for the first time after the pit lane is open on the day of the race, until after the start lockout period after the race has started.

In addition bite point finder activation by the driver has to be inhibited by disabling any driver button or switch associated with that function. The FIA adds that the “bite point update from the bite point finder should be disabled by setting BBitePointFinderUsed to zero.”

The FIA says that all pit-to-car communications during any reconnaissance or formation laps will be limited to safety and sporting information, so in other words there can be no discussion of start procedures.

The only permissible radio conversations during those pre-race laps will involve indication of a critical problem with the car, such as puncture warning or damage, an indication of a problem with a competitor’s car, an instruction to enter the pit lane in order to fix or retire the car, marshalling information (for example yellow flag, red flag, race start aborted or other similar instructions), information regarding a wet track, oil or debris in certain corners, or finally instructions to swap position with other drivers, for example if someone is late off the dummy grid.

The FIA says that any other message at these times would be considered a breach of Article 20.1 of the Sporting Regulations.

8 Comments

Filed under F1, F1 News, Grand Prix News

“Je regrette” says Streiff as he apologises to Todt

Philippe Streiff did not waste time in apologising

Philippe Streiff did not waste time in apologising


Philippe Steiff has acted quickly to fend off legal action from the FIA, Jean Todt and Gerard Saillant by apologising for comments he made about them in a web TV interview.

The former F1 driver had in essence questioned both the findings and composition of the FIA Accident Panel that investigated the Jules Bianchi accident.

After legal action was promised by the FIA yesterday he used Facebook to make an apology.

He said: “I let myself get carried away in front of the camera; the interview took a long time – too long – and I am aware that I made insulting and defamatory comments about Jean Todt, Gérard Saillant and the FIA, which I sincerely regret.

“I refute and take back these accusations, which are unfounded, and ask the press to remove them from their media.

“Lastly, I ask Jean Todt and Gérard Saillant, who are well aware of my health problems, to excuse me. I regret having said things about them that are totally out of line with the consideration that they both deserve.”

3 Comments

Filed under F1, F1 News, Grand Prix News

How will the FIA spend its Concorde cash?

The FIA’s confirmation that the new Concorde Agreement will bring in extra funds has put a focus on how that money will be used by the governing body.

A statement today said: “This agreement provides the FIA with significantly improved financial means to pursue its regulatory missions and to reflect the enhanced role undertaken by the FIA in the Motor Sport [sic].”

Jean Todt’s plans for those funds are a subject of great debate within the FIA, not least because after six years the “McLaren money” – generated from the team’s infamous 2007 Spygate fine – will no longer be available for grass roots funding.

Todt is believed to be planning to split it between sport and mobility, with a further sum allocated to developing a new FIA HQ in Switzerland. That proposed division has apparently not gone down well with those who believe that the cash should be ploughed back into the sport.

In the World Motor Sport Council today a member brought the subject up, and Todt apparently promised to establish a commission to discuss the matter.

Meanwhile presidential candidate David Ward said today: “The question now is what will the new resources from Concorde be used for? The answer should be for investment in ‘grass roots’ development of motor sport.

“In my manifesto I have proposed to ‘use all the revenue in excess of regulatory costs of the F1 Championship for investment in motor sport safety, sustainability, solidarity funding of ASN development programmes, and for training of officials and volunteers.

“Jean Todt has yet to publish a manifesto or explain how he will use the new funds now available to the FIA. Sooner rather than later this should be made clear to the FIA membership.”

1 Comment

Filed under F1 News, Grand Prix News

Bernie Ecclestone: “FOM and Pirelli have a contract…”

Bernie Ecclestone has downplayed Michelin’s prospects of replacing Pirelli as F1’s sole tyre supplier, despite the French company formally confirming to the FIA that it is interested in the role.

Ecclestone has always been close to Pirelli, while FIA President Jean Todt is known to be sympathetic to Michelin.

One senior team figure told this blog at Spa that it would require a bold decision by Todt to open the door for Michelin at this late stage, and given that an FIA election is the way, such a controversial move seemed unlikely to happen.

When questioned by about Michelin’s chances Ecclestone said simply that “FOM and Pirelli have a contract.”

Asked why there was not yet a contract between the FIA and Pirelli – the one that Paul Hembery is awaiting – Bernie dismissed its relevance.

“We don’t need one, I don’t think,” he told this blog. “They are nothing to do with commercial. The FIA’s position is that they are regulators, they regulate all the regulations that have been agreed.”

He was keen to downplay any role for Todt in the process of selecting the tyre supplier.

“Jean is the president of the FIA. If it’s a matter of a vote in the World Council, he has one vote. As it’s not a matter for the World Council, it doesn’t make a lot of difference.”

Bernie also denied that there was any interest from the teams in joining forces with Michelin.

“None of the teams who have spoken to me have said that. All the teams who have spoken to me say they are very happy with Pirelli, and the problems they’ve had, they’re happy that they’ve dealt with them.”

Although the regulations currently ensure that F1 has a sole supplier, there does seem to be some logic in a potential move towards competition in the future, especially if both companies are willing to pump money into the sport.

Intriguingly Bernie indicated that he does not support the idea of Michelin competing with Pirelli: “Because they will want to pick the teams that they think will win, and they’ll pay them a lot more money to take them as opposed to somebody else. We have a deal with Pirelli, anyway.”

Exactly how the tyre saga will play out in the coming weeks remains to be seen, but the bottom line is that time is running out for all concerned.

2 Comments

Filed under F1 News, Grand Prix News, Uncategorized