Vasseur: Sainz was “really under control” on way to Mexico City win

Vasseur joins the Ferrari celebrations in Mexico on Sunday

Ferrari Formula 1 boss Fred Vasseur says that Carlos Sainz was “really under control” over the course of the Mexico City GP weekend.

Sainz set two laps that were good enough for pole, and having ceded the lead to Max Verstappen on the first lap he fought back to score a dominant win.

He was chased for his while by team mate Charles Leclerc. The US GP winner eventually dropped behind Lando Norris to take third after running wide coming out of the final corner.

“It was a very strong weekend from the beginning,” said Vasseur of Sainz. “From FP1 he was there, FP2 he was very strong, a long stint, and one-lap pace. And the race, he did a very good job at the end.

“If you have a look, that he was really under control. I think was very clever to give up the position in the lap one. And it’s also the proof that he is very self-confident in this situation, because when you are fighting with Max and you are to give up and say, ‘Okay, I will do it next lap,’ it’s a good move.”

Expanding on that theme he said: “I think what was very clever from Carlos, and it was already the same last week I think with Russell, is that when you are in the fight and you are overtaking someone, and you are not sure, to give back the position. And the two times that he was able to come back the lap after and to do the move again.

“And I think it was a very clever, clever move, because that you can fight three or four corners in a row. First you lose two seconds, and at the end you will get the penalty or not. But you are really on the edge.

“I think he was very self-confident. It meant that he gave a position, but I think he was also convinced that he will be able to do it next time.”

Vasseur also defended Leclerc, noting that he lost out under blue flags while being chased by Norris, and that triggered his mistake at the final corner.

He also hinted that the Monegasque driver had more cooling issues to manage than his team mate.

“I think that Charles was on a good pace, but we lost three seconds with the guys who were blue flag,” he said. “And we lost also a lot of temperature in the tyres at this stage. And then he made a mistake. But I think from the beginning, the race was in our control.”

“The race in Mexico. And I don’t want to give technical details, it’s a lot about management, the cooling on everything, and it’s not an easy exercise. And sometimes, for details, you are on the right side or not.

“Carlos did a very good job from the beginning. He was also in clean air all the race, and it’s also much easier to manage in this situation.

“Charles was not happy with FP3. But still today, he did a good race. I’m a bit upset with the story with the blue flag. It cost us P2, but at the end of the day, it is like it is. We have to be focused now on the next one, and to forget this one.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

How “something weird” has given Magnussen more confidence in Haas VF-24

Haas had another great weekend in Mexico City

Kevin Magnussen says that “something weird” has happened and given him confidence in the Haas VF-24 in last two races, with the Dane citing changes to the brakes as one possible reason.

The team had an aero update in Austin, where Magnussen qualified eighth for the sprint, and finished it in seventh.

He also qualified ninth for the main event, although he finished out of the points after a strategy miss-step by the team.

In Mexico he qualified and finished seventh, well clear of team mate Nico Hulkenberg and the rest of the midfield runners.

The team’s recent haul of points has pulled it clear of VCARB in the battle for sixth in the World Championship.

“I think we did the best we could today,” said Magnussen when I asked about his performance.

“We couldn’t have done it better if we tried it again. So just had the kind that sweet spot, was super confident in the car, very, very comfortable, didn’t make any mistake through the whole race.

“So it was just so easy to drive, I could push the tyres and manage them at the same time, and just got it into that little window where the magic happens.”

Magnussen admitted that he was surprised by his race form relative to the following pack.

“I wasn’t confident on the grid before the race that I was just going to be pulling away,” he said. “But that ended up being the case.

“I was behind Mercedes, so kind of I was thinking, this might be okay! So, yeah, very happy.”

Asked why it has gone so well he said: “I don’t know. We made some changes, to the brakes, for example. And I’ve just been very confident in the car.

“And what I need to do is try and hang on to that confidence. Something weird has changed in that the last two races that has given me a car that I can really push.”

He added: “I think it’s getting better and better. As I said a couple of things, apart from the upgrade, were changed, and are better.

“So certainly I’ve been very confident in the car in the last two races, and it’s been nice to drive, and it’s been enjoyable.”

Magnussen said that new confidence was the key to his stronger qualifying performances.

“I think when you’re really on the limit, you need to be confident on the brakes,” he said. “You need to just feel confident that the car is going to do what you what you ask it to. And we’ve had a quick car for a while, I just haven’t been confident with it.

“And these last two races, at least, I’ve been confident. And I think it’s down to some of the changes that were done to the brakes, for example.

“And I think the upgrade is also in my direction. We’ve got a stronger rear, and a little bit weaker front. So I think that’s not bad for me.”

Asked if the car can be a Q3 challenger everywhere he was more circumspect.

“I wouldn’t be surprised if it swings around,” he said. “It’s F1, so you never know. And especially in the midfield, there’s no guarantee. So we’ve been strong in these last two races, and very happy that we got something out of that.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Piastri: “Difficult” progress to eighth in Mexico was hampered by lack of clean air

Piastri recovered to eighth after starting only 17th

Oscar Piastri says it was tougher than he had expected to get through the field in the Formula 1 Mexico City GP, and that he suffered from rarely being able to run in clear air.

The McLaren driver started only 187th after a mistake in qualifying, and was one of the few drivers at the back of the field to start on medium tyres.

He managed to run a marathon 40-lap stint on them as he worked his way up to an eventual eighth place at the flag.

Piastri said while the result was disappointing, it had nevertheless been a good weekend for him.

“I think when the field is so tightly-bunched, it’s always very difficult to make progress,” he said. “So, yeah it was maybe a little bit tougher than I expected.

“I think the pace at the end of the race was good once I got some clean air. I just didn’t have enough of it, starting from where I was.

“So obviously that’s the thing to work on next week. I think outside the results, honestly, it felt like it was coming together to be a good weekend.

“So the result is obviously a massive shame, but I think there’s still some positives comparing to last weekend, which was a pretty lonely P5, I felt like today, I at least had a bit more control over my destiny. So let’s see what can happen next week.”

After the start Piastri took several laps even to get past the Saubers of Zhou Guanyu and Valtteri Bottas.

“It was tough,” he said. “I think looking at last year’s race for Lando, and even last week for George, it’s very, very tough no matter which car you’re in, to get through a pack.

“You kind of need to wait for everything to spread out a bit. And once it did spread out, then I was able to come through reasonably quickly.

“It’s just that you’re kind of at the mercy of what the cars ahead of you do. So hopefully the tyres we tested in FP2 make that a bit easier next year, but hopefully I don’t have to start that far back again and do a better job at quali.

“So obviously, some things to improve, but I think outside of the results, behind the scenes, I felt like it was a much more positive weekend than Austin. So looking forward to next week.”

Among the drivers who made it hardest for him was Franco Colapinto, with Piastri twice coming up behind the Williams driver.

“Honestly, in the first stint, he was not too slow,” said the Australian. “I think after I pitted, he had to quite a big moment, and then defended very hard, which I think cost both of us a lot of time. But he can do what he wants. He doesn’t have to make life easy.

“So it was just a bit tougher than I expected to get through. But once we had some clean air, the pace was good. So think the key in that is make sure we got clean air by qualifying in front.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Alonso: “Destiny” to retire from 400th race with brake issues

Alonso didn’t have much luck in his 400th start

Fernando Alonso says it was “destiny” to retire from his 400th Formula 1 race in Mexico City with overheating brakes after his unique milestone put him in the spotlight all weekend.

The Aston Martin driver suffered with soaring front left brake temperatures after a visor tear-off was caught in the duct.

He was thus called into retire after only 15 laps while running outside the points in 13th place.

“The start was a little bit chaotic,” he said when asked by this writer about the first lap. “But I think we took advantage, Lance [Stroll] and myself, to gain some positions. I think we were under control, 11th and 12th, waiting for some opportunities, maybe to score points.

“But by lap 13, or something like that, apparently, the temperatures were unsafe and a little bit over the moon on the front left, so we took some actions on the steering wheel to protect the front temperatures.

“But they told me there is a little a bit of debris or tear-off or something in the front from brake duct. So destiny, a little bit unlucky today to not finish the race.”

He added: “Initially, the team was spotting the temperature. And then the last two laps, the brake pedal was slowing, and I think we reached an unsafe temperature to keep running.”

Alonso said that the team had learned some useful information having run a mixture of older and newer parts, and different specs on both cars.

“It was a useful weekend,” he said. “A lot of testing going on in FP1, FP2, some conclusions that we can take on board. And, yeah, hopefully we come back stronger.

“The level of performance is still not where we want to be, and we need more, so more evaluation will come in Brazil.”

He said he appreciated the attention that his 400 races record attracted.

“It was a good weekend in that side, a lot of love from everyone in the paddock this weekend, a lot of respect,” he said. “So it was nice to feel all of that. And I take it. I have a positive feeling after this weekend, despite the result, after the emotions that I was going through from Friday to today’s race.

“So, yeah, looking forward for a better result. As I said, first of all, the performance needs to get better. It was a unlucky weekend, with the yellow flag in Q2, and with today the debris on the front brake duct.

“But some other weekends, I was very lucky. And we were maybe not in the points today. So I take the bad luck when we are not in the points.”

Asked if Interlagos will suit the car he said: “Last year it did. I think we were out of Q1 or nearly out of Q1 here in Mexico, and then we went in Brazil, and we fought for a podium until the last lap. So yeah, reasonably confident that Brazil will get better.”

Aston Martin team principal Mike Krack acknowledged that the temperature issue could not be resolved, and added that he hopes Alonso’s net race will be better.

“It was building, building, building,” he said. “Normally in the first 10 laps of a race everything is overheating. And then there is stabilisation phase.

“But we saw quickly that on the brake side. It did not stabilise, it just went and went. And then if you go into the oxidation phase, that is something that you should always avoid. “So we had to make the unfortunate call that 400th race we had to end it quite early. I said it to his own colleagues we have to make sure that 401 is the proper one.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Russell says collapsed Mercedes front wing made it “tricky to hold on”

Wing damage cost Russell time as he tried to hold off Hamilton

George Russell admits that a collapsed front wing cost him lap time and made it “tricky to hold on” in front of Mercedes Formula 1 team mate Lewis Hamilton in the Mexico City GP.

Hamilton got ahead of Russell at the start, but Russell later repassed. However the wing was damaged when he hit a bump passing Oscar Piastri, and that cost him downforce, and left him vulnerable to attack from Hamilton.

Having managed to stay ahead for many laps Russell eventually had to cede what was by then fourth place.

“I made a really strong start, but you’re kind of at the mercy of where the drivers in front of you go,” he said I asked about initially losing out to Hamilton.

“And unfortunately, they all went to the right. Last year they went to my left, and I’d have been able to get the launch, but I kind of got a bit snowballed from not getting my slipstream.

“The pace looked pretty strong in the first stint, but when I came out the pits behind Piastri, I pulled out down the straight and my front left flap just completely collapsed. I hit this bump.

“So that probably cost me a good three or four-tenths for the remainder of the race. So that was tricky to hold on for 40 laps. P5, I probably would have taken that after Friday.”

Russell agreed that he’d enjoyed a fair fight with Hamilton, contrasting to the footage he’d seen of the Max Verstappen/Lando Norris battle up ahead.

“It was nice to have the battle,” he said. “It’s always good when you fight with Lewis, because it’s hard and fair. And at the moment, you see a number of manoeuvres that are just getting beyond entertaining, or beyond sort of sporting. It’s just almost unfair to a point now.”

GPDA director Russell said that discussions over racing guidelines with the FIA at the drivers’ briefing had been productive.

“I think the stewards are totally on board with what needs to change,” he said. “I think the biggest discussion is they wanted to wait until ’25 so it’s something consistent through this year.

“I would say 19 out of 20 drivers said, well, if it’s incorrect, make the change today. And I’m glad to see those incidents were punished today. And I suspect moving forward in Brazil, what we saw today and what we saw last week, you won’t be able to get away with.”

Regarding the time lag he added: “Sometimes seems more difficult when it has to be, when things have to get approved and they’ve got to go to a vote the SAC [sporting advisory committee] or whatever it is. But as I said, 19 out of 20, we’re all aligned with where it needs to be.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Perez: Lawson is “not showing the right attitude…”

The Lawson v Perez battle became a little emotional last weekend…

Sergio Perez says that his fellow Red Bull driver Liam Lawson is “not showing the right attitude” after the pair clashed in the Formula 1 Mexico City GP.

Perez started from a lowly 18th on the grid, and his weekend was hampered further when he received a five-second penalty for being in front of his grid box at the start.

He was making progress through the field when he tangled with the RB of Lawson, who is widely tipped to replace him at Red Bull Racing at some stage.

Perez’s car suffered floor and sidepod damage in the incident, and he eventually finished 17th, while Lawson was 16th after a later incident with Franco Colapinto.

A frustrated Perez pointed out that Lawson had also upset Fernando Alonso in the Austin sprint a week earlier.

“It was looking good,” said Perez when asked about the incident. “We were already up to P10, and then he was outside the track and just came straight like if there was no car. I think he could have avoided the incident, but he just went back.

“Luckily, I saw him, and I opened the room. Otherwise it would have been a massive crash. There was no need, he damaged both of our races.

“I think it was just a little bit too much, but I don’t think his fault. He’s not getting any penalties as well. He did the same with Fernando, and with Franco in the end. There are no penalties, so none of his fault as well.”

Perez didn’t hold back when asked further about Lawson.

“I don’t have any relationship with him,” he said. “I think the way he has come to F1, I don’t think has the right attitude for it.

“He needs to be a bit more humble, when a two-time world champion was saying things last weekend, he completely ignored him.

“It’s like when you come to F1, you’re obviously very, very hungry and so on. But you have to be as well respectful off-track and on-track.

“I don’t think he’s showing the right attitude to show a good case for himself, because I think he’s a great driver, and I hope for him that he can step back and learn from this.”

Expanding on the theme he added: “You see these youngsters, obviously very hungry for it, and they’re really passionate, and it’s great to see. They have a great talent, but I’m just talking about Lawson in this regard.

“In his two first Grands Prix he has had too many incidents. And I think there will be a point where, where it can cost him too much, like he did this weekend.

“And are you seeing that he has to have the right attitude to say, I’m overdoing it a little bit, I will step back, and start again.

“And it’s all the learning you have to do as a youngster, because if you don’t learn from your mistakes, F1 is a brutal world out there, and he might not continue.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Wolff: Crashes have pushed Mercedes towards F1 cost cap limit

Three big crashes have put a dent in the Mercedes cost cap budget

Mercedes Formula 1 boss Toto Wolff has confirmed that the team’s recent run of major accidents has impacted the cost cap so severely that it has stopped the flow of development updates.

Kimi Antonelli crashed in FP1 in Monza and then George Russell had offs in both Austin and Mexico, with the latter forcing the spare chassis into usage.

After the Austin crash the team had only one of its latest floors in Mexico last weekend, but the damaged one has been repaired, and will be available in Brazil.

However Wolff anticipates that no further new parts will make it to the track.  

“Kimi’s crash in Monza, George’s crash in Austin, George’s crash here,” said Wolff last weekend. “I love a driver to push, and I’d rather crash and we know what the car is capable of doing than not. In cost cap land nevertheless, it’s a tricky situation.

“So these three shunts put us on the back foot. And certainly the one that happened [in FP2 In Mexico] was massive. We had to opt for a completely new chassis, and that is a tremendous hit in the cost cap.

“And we probably have to dial down on what we put on the car. So we will be having two upgrade packages in Brazil, two floors, but that’s basically it.

“There’s nothing else that’s going to come. We have certain limitation on parts where we need to be creative how we’re managing this. And certainly there is an impact on how many development parts we can put on the car, because the answer is zero.”

In Mexico Lewis Hamilton had the newer floor and Russell the older one, although no decision has been made on what will happen in Brazil.

“I’m always open-minded about what the drivers think,” said Wolff. “If I’m certain that George is going to go for the new and Lewis may want to back-to-back the old floor now in Brazil, and we will certainly talk with him what his preference is.”

Wolff also explained how Russell suffered the front wing damage that hampered him during the Mexican race.

“When overtaking Piastri out of the pits he hit a bump, and they came very close, so the amount of turbulence might have played a role,” he said.

“One of the main front flaps collapsed. So it was a tremendous loss of downforce. I think in the high-speed, it was 20 points. He then kind of drove around it very well. But obviously, the more your tyres are being hit, the impact on lap time is exponential.”

Regarding Russell’s superior pace in Mexico he added: “I think with the hard run, you saw that there was quite a bit of a difference. So two reasons. First of all, I think George drove very well all weekend.

“And on the other side, there may be something in the update package that causes something that we don’t understand, because we had two massive crashes in the same corner in Austin, but then we had a crash on the old car too.

“So these cars are so on the knife’s edge that it will be an interesting experiment in Brazil to see whether there is a high-speed instability or low-speed factor.

“So I don’t think we can just extrapolate that one is better than the other, which we know it’s not.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Hamilton on a clean fight with Russell: “I don’t think either of us are silly…”

Hamilton enjoyed a “fun” fight with team mate Russell

Mercedes drivers Lewis Hamilton and George Russell showed how to do it when they enjoyed a clean fight for position in the Formula 1 Mexico City GP, and while the rules of engagement are different for team mates, they had been told that they were free to race.

Hamilton got ahead of Russell at the start, but the latter managed to repass on lap 15.

Despite being hampered by front wing damage Russell held on in front until Hamilton got by again in the closing laps as they claimed fourth and fifth places at the flag.

Hamilton was running the latest floor, and Russell the earlier version, and they finished just 3.7s apart.

The fact that they spent time following each other gave both men a chance to assess the behaviour of the other car.

“I mean, it’s pretty straightforward,” said Hamilton when I asked him about the battle.

“I don’t think either of us are silly. George is really smart, and so it’s fair, and he’s just really good at where he places his car. And I think for me too.

“So when they come on the radio and say, ‘Keep it clean,’ it’s like, ‘Of course!’ It’s no real different to when you’re fighting anyone else, except for it is your team mate. So had to be double careful, because you both want to finish.”

Hamilton said he enjoyed the fight, although life was tough for him until he was able to make a wing adjustment at his pit stop.

“I had fun today,” he said. “Had a good start, had a really bad stint, took too much front wing out the car. Had massive, massive understeer. I was like, damn! Because you have to basically guesstimate where you’re going to be with the front wing. And I had a lot less than George.

“For the laps to the grid, it felt like it was the right thing, and it was clearly not. Then after my stop, I was able to rectify it. And then after that, I had much better pace, and was able to push and keep going.

“And we stopped a little bit early as well, compared to what I planned to stop. And we got good points.”

Hamilton acknowledged that Russell didn’t make it easy for him to pass: “He didn’t! But I had 10 laps. I knew it was going to happen at some point. I think he had a problem with his front wing.

“But we got a lot of information. I could see on his car where he was better than me, and I’m sure, hopefully, be able to see where he’s better than me, package-wise. And hopefully they have lots of data, so we’ll figure out who starts on what next race.”

Regarding the debate about guidelines in Friday’s drivers’ briefing Hamilton said: “They spoke about it for a long time, with no conclusion. I think they said they’re going to sit down in one of the races coming up to talk about how we can go about making it better.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Stella: McLaren told Norris “don’t be desperate” and “don’t find justice yourself…”

Norris was told to leave justice to the FIA stewards…

McLaren Formula 1 boss Andrea Stella says that Lando Norris has been told to not “find justice yourself” in his fights with Max Verstappen, and instead rely on FIA stewarding decisions.

In effect that message meant not to retaliate on-track should the Red Bull driver do something that Norris felt was unfair.

Verstappen received two 10-second penalties for his moves on Norris in the Mexico City GP, and Stella praised the stewards, suggesting that they “took feedback on board” after the recent Austin controversy.

“I think Lando can look at his own racing, often looking at the half empty glass in relation to what he could do,” he said. “But our conversation and our internal reviews have always been very clear.

“Lando, we like, we approve, we confirm the way you go racing. It’s not for you to go there and trying to find justice yourself.

“You go racing in a fair, sportive way like you do, and then there needs to be a third party that is the stewarding, that will say whether some manoeuvres are correct or not.

“Don’t be desperate. Don’t have to prove anything. You go racing fair and square. This is what we want from Lando. This is what Lando wants from himself.

“And I think it was important, though, that the team kind of confirms that’s what we want from you Lando. That’s what we want to go, racing at McLaren and for a driver driving a McLaren car.

“So in this sense, I think this is a positive day, because it has proven that I think it’s good to race hard, but it can’t be resolved on track by the two drivers. It needs a third party. It needs the authority.

“So we are completely happy with the way Lando has been gone racing before, and anytime I read this kind of headlines, I always needed to have a conversation with Lando reassure him. Don’t worry, he will be all right. Time is a gentleman.”

Regarding the second incident in Mexico Stella said: “I think Lando was going through his normal line, because he would have never expected Max to go for the inside.

“But effectively, I think the development of the incident proved that there was no way to keep the car on track for Max.

“So I think Lando was caught a little bit by surprise, but the evidence is, is that it’s quite fair that he was surprised, because actually, you cannot keep a car on track if you enter the corner on the inside at that speed.”

Stella says Norris knew not to take any risks in the remainder of the Mexican race after getting stuck behind Verstappen following their initial tussle.

“The message we gave to Lando was we have pace, if we can pass him, let’s do it,” he said. “Because we understood at some stage that we could compete with Ferrari, and we were losing time behind Max.

“But obviously we didn’t need to say – Lando knows very well that this kind of overtaking needs to happen in a safe way, because for us, we are competing on both fronts, the drivers’ championship and the constructors’ championship, and even when you engage these kind of battles, you need to think both things, like we need to finish races.

“But this was clear. We have talked extensively about this before the race in our objectives with the drivers, so we didn’t need to repeat to Lando.”

Stella, who made his point by initiating an unsuccessful right of review request after Norris was penalised in Austin, said the stewards had got it right this time.

“In my view, the penalties seem to be consistent with the application of the guidelines in relation to those kinds of incidents,” he noted. “So I think from this point of view, this has been a positive day, because it shows that authority exists.

“It shows that the stewards have done a good job, a good job that surely becomes because of constant review, like we do in F1 in any kind of thing you do, you then review, and you try to improve. And certainly we as a team, there’s many things that we know we can review and improve.

“And to me, it looks like this process has happened also in terms of stewarding, in terms of the FIA having taken some feedback constructively on board. And we appreciate this, and we not as a team, but as a part of the F1 community, I feel like I have to thank the FIA and the stewards.”

He added: “I do trust the work of the stewards. In my view, today, they interpreted the racing scenarios accurately. They applied the guidelines consistently. And like I said, this for me, this is a positive news for everyone.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Horner on driving guidelines: “Max will always drive aggressively…”

Horner used a Norris GPS data trace to demonstrate his case

Red Bull boss Christian Horner says that Max Verstappen will “always drive aggressively” within the current FIA Formula 1 driving guidelines.

Horner also suggested that those guidelines encourage drivers to dive down the outside into corners even if they are likely to go off track.

He indicated that was the case when Verstappen picked up a 10-second penalty for forcing Lando Norris off track at Turn 4 early in the Mexico City GP, before the Dutchman received another one for gaining an advantage while passing off-track.

He believes that the guidelines should be revisited to avoid “a mess” in the remaining four races.

The FIA has already invited drivers to discuss them in Qatar, although that meeting will be after the Interlagos and Las Vegas events.

“Max will always drive aggressively to what he perceives as the regulations,” said Horner. And when you step over that mark, then of course, you’ll get a penalty.

“I just fear that we’re perhaps over-complicating, and all I would do is encourage that there’s is a constructive discussion between the drivers and the driver steward to say, ‘Okay, we’re going to have another four hotly contested races. What is and what isn’t allowed?’”

Horner used a GPS data trace in an attempt to demonstrate to the media that Norris would not have made the corner at Turn 4 when the first incident occurred. He compared the McLaren driver’s fastest lap with the lap he was battling with Verstappen.

“He wouldn’t have made the corner,” Horner insisted. “He would have run off-track. You can see from his onboard steering. And of course, at this point in the race, he’s got probably 80 kilos more fuel than the point that he’s done his fastest lap.

“It used to be a reward of the bravest to go around the outside. I think we’re in danger of flipping the overtaking laws upside down, where drivers will just try to get their nose ahead at the apex, and then claim that they have to be given room on the exit.

“You can see quite clearly, he’s effectively come off the brakes, gone in super, super late to try and win that argument, as far as the way these regulations are written. And then at that point, you’re penalised.”

Horner said that the driver on the inside should always have priority.

“Now, every karting circuit, every indoor karting circuit around the world, if you’ve got the inside line, you control the corner,” he said. “It’s one of the principles in the physics of racing.

“And I think that they just need to get back to basics, that if you’re on the outside, you don’t have priority, and otherwise we will end up with a mess over these last four races.

“So I think it’s really important that that the driver steward, together with the drivers, agrees something that is sensible, rather than what we’re getting.”

He added: “Maybe we’re over-complicating things. And when you have to revert to an instruction manual of an overtake. I mean, the racing principles for years have been, if you have the inside line, you dictate the corner.

“And the way the regulations have, or the guidelines have evolved, is encouraging a driver to have his nose ahead at apex, irrelevant of whether you’re going to make the corner.

“You can quite see it clearly see on the overlay of those two laps that Lando has hung out there to get that advantage.

“So it’s something that just needs to be, I think, tidied up, so that everybody knows what is acceptable between now and the end of the season. Otherwise, we’re going to end up in a mess at the upcoming races.

“And I think it’s just important that the rules of engagement are fair, rather than giving an advantage to the outside line, which in the history of motorsport, being on the outside has always been the more risked place to be.

“But now it’s almost the advantage, because all you’ve got to do is have your nose ahead at the point that they turn in, irrelevant of whether you’re going to make the corner or not.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized