PU issue made Leclerc “a sitting duck” in Montreal

Leclerc endured a difficult weekend in Montreal

Charles Leclerc says that the Ferrari power unit issue that spoiled his Canadian GP made him a “sitting duck” in the first part of the race.

When a safety car came out the Monegasque driver lost a lot of time in the pits having the PU reset, and the team then took a gamble by sending him out on slick tyres while everyone else switched to fresh intermediates.

After struggling around for a couple of laps he was forced to pit again for intermediates, and having been lapped by the leaders his car was eventually retired by the team.

“I don’t know what happened,” said Leclerc when asked by this writer about the PU issue.

“Obviously we were losing a second. I mean, at first I think it was six-tenths, but then some laps, it was 1.2s, sometimes it was 1.5s, sometimes it was one second. So every time I was going on power, I didn’t know what I will get.

“It was first of all very difficult to drive, very frustrating, because in the straights I would get overtaken by everybody, and very annoying, because I had like 10 or 15 switches per lap to change, to try and reset everything and to try to make it work.

“But in the first part of the race, I think we did quite a good job managing that. And because we were in very wet conditions, or wet conditions, we could recover in corners. So I was still believing we could finish in the points. But then as soon as it dried up, I was a sitting duck in the straights.”

Leclerc admitted that the distraction of the switch adjustments didn’t make life easy.

“Actually, I found it a bit better when it was fully wet. The tricky part was then it was half dry/half wet. You’ve got to look at your steering wheel, and there you’ve got only one line. And if you are off by two or three or five centimetres, you are you are done. So that was very tricky.”

Leclerc conceded that while the PU issue was more frustrating than the unsuccessful tyre choice.

“It felt annoying, but at the end, that was the best we could do at that point,” he said. “I knew we will finish out of the points whatever happened with that issue, so we had to try something with the slicks.

“I was more frustrated about the whole situation and the engine performance in the straights than the actual choice, because if that was working out, maybe that was our only chance to maybe finish ninth, 10th.

“And without that working out, or staying in the position we were in before, we will have lost any points.”

Leclerc admitted that stopping the car was the logical choice: “It was quite frustrating as well, but I knew the race was over by that time, the only thing was I wasn’t feeling really happy in the car, because I had so much dust on my mirrors that I couldn’t see anything, and I just didn’t want to get in the way of people that were fighting for the lead.

“So that was the only situation I was in at the end, but I knew that it was finished by that time.”

Leclerc says the team has to bounce back from the disappointing Montreal weekend.

“We still have some work to do, and obviously, on a weekend like this we need to be on it and maximising all the points.

“I think that’s what we have done extremely well until now. Today with the engine issue I don’t think we could have maximised much more, but these are the things that we need to look at, and be on it.”

Leclerc also referenced the lack of pace in qualifying, which he says was not related to being on used tyres at the end of Q2: “I think the biggest problem was mostly the fact that we weren’t fast, whatever laps we were doing, on whatever tyres we were slow,” he said.

“And this we’ve got to look into it. I think it’s more tyre preparation once again, because we have seen some really good surprises of some teams, and some others that weren’t as good, including us, compared to what we would expect. So yeah, we’ll look into it.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Frustrated Perez left struggling after “strange session” in Canada

Perez had another tricky qualifying session in Canada

Sergio Perez says he struggled with his Red Bull RB20 while qualifying a frustrated 16th in a “strange session” in Canada.

Like other drivers Perez had difficulties with tyre temperatures, and was lacking rear grip.

The Mexican qualified 18th in the last race in Monaco, although he also started 16th there after penalties for the Haas drivers gave him a boost.

The difficult Montreal weekend comes just a few days after he was confirmed at RBR until 2026.

“It’s a massive frustration,” he said when asked by this writer about his qualifying. “I think it was a session where everything was reset with the weather, and we just couldn’t get everything to work, especially the rear axle.

“I think it was a very strange session for a lot of cars out there, and we did the struggle quite a lot with the rear end. So I think we’ve got to understand what’s the reason behind it.”

Perez made it clear that there are lessons to be learned from how the session played out.

“I think in hindsight, there are things we could have done better, but fundamentally, we were lacking some pace today,” he said.

“I think the track being so green, it really reset things up. But I was just struggling to put the temperature into the tyre, and I think that was the main trouble.

“I think we’ve got some bits to understand. And hopefully we get through tomorrow, and if we are able to secure a couple of points that will be a good result. And then really just go from there.”

Regarding the bigger picture he said: “I think when you look at the Ferraris, they were on pole in Monaco, and I think this track is not very different to that.

“I think it’s a long season. It will only matter where we finish in Abu Dhabi. There will be very different tracks coming up. But like I say, I think we’ve got some fundamental issue today that we have to understand.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Leclerc: “We are just not fast enough…”

Ferrari had a disastrous qualifying session in Montreal

Charles Leclerc says that Ferrari was “just not fast enough” after neither he nor team mate Carlos Sainz made it to Q3 in Montreal.

The pair were bumped out in 11th and 12th places respectively in Q2 after they struggled to get their tyres up to temperature at the start of a lap.

In addition they didn’t take new tyres for their final laps of the session, instead pitting to take a scrubbed set that had done one lap.

After aborting his lap Leclerc said “I guess we are f****d. I won’t comment here…” as he returned to the pits.

“We are just not fast enough,” said Leclerc when asked by this writer about his session. !And yeah, unfortunately, that’s it. In FP3 we were nowhere on the dry, in qualifying, we were nowhere on the dry as well. It’s like this.”

“I don’t have any explanations for now. In FP3 already we felt that something was wrong, we couldn’t see what was wrong. And that was exactly the same in qualifying, where it definitely felt like something was wrong, but nothing we could see was wrong.

“So the grip was just extremely poor in the first sector especially. And then once you slide in the first sector, there is a no snowball effect, and you never really get the performance out of the car. So yeah, difficult weekend until now.”

Leclerc admitted that he was surprised that the team struggled so much in Montreal.

“I did not expect that, and it’s obviously disappointing. But we’ve got a race tomorrow, and I believe that in the race, the issues that we have had in qualifying will be a bit different.”

Asked about the decision not to run new tyres he said: “I’ll review that with the team, I’m not sure.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Ricciardo answers critics on 10th anniversary of “effortless” debut F1 win

The Ricciardo smile was back after Montreal qualifying…

Daniel Ricciardo says the 10th anniversary of his “effortless” first Grand Prix victory helped to provided extra motivation ahead of his charge to P5 in qualifying in Canada.

The performance came after a disappointing run of races of the Australian, whose maiden victory for Red Bull came in Montreal on June 8th 2014.

Although he qualified fourth and finished in the same position in the Miami sprint last month Ricciardo has usually struggled to match team mate Yuki Tsunoda.

Inevitably he has faced some criticism in recent weeks, with former World Champion Jacques Villeneuve making negative comments to the UK’s Sky F1.

“I’ve obviously been highly motivated to do more than I have been this year,” he said when asked by this writer about his Montreal qualifying performance.

“Obviously Miami was a bit of a one-off, but I know how good those results feel, and that’s why I do it, to fill those highs. So I think just coming into the week, I don’t know, everything felt right.

“I was really happy just to come back to this circuit and drive here, because I love it. And today’s 10 years to the day of my first win, and that day changed my life. So there’s a lot of nice emotions coming into it. And I just felt like I was ready to do some good shit!”

Regarding Villeneuve’s criticism he said: “I still don’t know what he said, but I heard he’s been talking shit, but he always does.

“I think he’s hit his head a few too many times. So I don’t know if he plays ice hockey or something! Anyway, I won’t give him the time of day.”

Ricciardo said his Montreal qualifying form was down to a combination of the car and his personal approach to the weekend.

“There’s I would say, two parts. Firstly, the car from when we put it down yesterday on track, I just had confidence in it. The car felt good, I was able to kind of slide it, and drive a little bit more aggressively. I just felt like I was getting on top of it. So yeah, I felt like the car was good.

“But also part two is we’re always going to be trying to perfect the car, but I also have to look at myself, and make sure that I’m in a good place to be able to do results like this.

“It’s obviously been a bit harder for me to find that sweet spot this year. And I look back at 10 years ago, I think it was kind of effortless.

“After Monaco, I tried to just understand. I was always looking at the on-track stuff, I can brake later here, or do this and that, but it was like, ‘Okay, what’s maybe some other things that are affecting my performances. Am I coming into a race weekend not feeling energised, or not feeling this or that?’

“So yeah, I think I just had a little bit of good, probably like self-therapy after Monaco, and just sat back and had a look at maybe the things I’m doing wrong away from the track, or maybe giving too much of my time to people, and by the time I get to race day or something, I’m a little bit more flat.

“Because I know it’s in me. So as I said, we’re always going to be trying to fine tune the car, but deep down, I know what I can do, and it’s just making sure that I’m in this spot to be able to do it more often, so trying to take as much accountability as possible. And yeah, just think a little bit broader.”

Ricciardo says he asked people for advice on what he could do differently.

“Basically just everyone around me, the team, engineers, my inner circle as well, just like, ‘Guys, open book, constructive criticism, give it to me. What do you think I can clean up? Where do you feel I’m maybe missing something?’

“A lot of it was kind of just probably energy management over the course of the weekend. So it’s not even what I’m doing in the car. It’s just what gets me into the car feeling like I’m fucking ready to go!

“So it was just trying to clean up some of those things. And if there was anything on my mind, try to just get it off my chest.

“And I just got into this weekend feeling certainly a bit lighter. And yeah, just hungry and happy and ready to say fuck you to people!”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

VCARB confirms Tsunoda for 2025

Tsunoda will stay in Faenza for a fifth season in 2025

The VCARB Formula 1 team has taken up its option on Yuki Tsunoda and the Japanese driver will stay with the Italian outfit in 2025.

It will be his fifth season with the former AlphaTauri team, all of them conducted with Honda power.

The team will switch to the RBP/Ford engine in 2026 when Honda hooks up with Aston Martin.

Tsunoda has enjoyed a strong start to the 2024 season, regularly making Q3 and scoring points five times in eight starts.

Although there had never really been any doubt that he would continue his confirmation ticks another box as next year’s F1 grid continues to fill up.

“I’m very happy to be staying with Visa Cash App RB and it’s a good feeling to have my future decided so early in the year,” said Tsunoda.

“For that, I want to thank everyone at Red Bull and Honda who have played such an important role in my career and will continue to do so. The team has a big development project ahead, and I’m excited to be part of it.

“It’s great to know that everyone appreciates all the hard work I have put in and that the team believes I can help it move further up the grid. We have already made clear progress this season and that really motivates me to always give of my best and that’s what I’ll continue to do with VCARB.

“For the moment, I’m concentrating on the remaining races this season, with the aim of bringing home as many points as possible, always growing with the team, laying the groundwork to do even better next year!”

Team principal Laurent Mekies highlighted Tsunoda’s “more mature approach” in 2024.

“I watched Yuki’s progress in F1 with interest even before I returned to Faenza and it’s been impressive, year after year,” said the Frenchman.

“The step up he has made this year is simply phenomenal, and he keeps surprising us all, race after race.

“There’s no doubting his natural speed to which he has now added a much more mature approach and this combination makes him a very quick and consistent performer, and a great team player.

“We continue to get a better understanding of what he needs from us and vice versa, so we are progressing together. We share the same ambitions, so there are several good reasons to continue our journey together. He still has a lot to give!”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Tombazis: 2026 F1 regulations will need refinement

The 2026 rules could change before teams start aero work in January

FIA single seater director Nikolas Tombazis insists that the 2026 Formula 1 technical regulations are not yet set in stone, and there is plenty of scope to make changes before they are finalised.

The FIA has given the teams the draft rules, and on Thursday the governing body issued the main details to the media.

Under the International Sporting Code the regulations have to be approved by the World Motor Sport Council by June 30.

Refinements can be made by the end of October, while in reality on the aero side the deadline for detailed changes is the end of the year, as teams cannot start work until January 1.

Teams and drivers have expressed doubts about some aspects of the draft regs, notably the 30kgs weight reduction, the low downforce and hence reduced speed in the corners, and the higher speed on the straights.

Teams are also on happy at how little freedom they have initially been given in terms of aerodynamic development.

However Tombazis made it clear that their views will be taken into consideration in the coming weeks.

“There’s clearly some concern expressed by some drivers or some teams,” he said. “First of all, these regulations are not yet approved.

“We are presenting them to the World Council on Tuesday in a very extensive manner, the aim being to have them approved by the World Council towards the end of the month. But that’s still not the case.

“Additionally, I would say that we clearly wanted to share these things with the media earlier, because we didn’t want things to leak from teams, we just wanted the media to get the full picture early on.

“But finally, most important of all, I would say, the World Council discussion, and hopefully the approval is the first step, we’re not in the final set of regulations yet.

“We do have quite a few things that we need to refine and discuss with the teams. We are fully conscious of some of the concerns over the level of downforce of the cars, or straightline speed, and these are things that are weak class as the refinements that still need to take place.

“So between, let’s say, the end of the month, when these regulations would hopefully be published, and the start of 2025 when teams can start aerodynamic development, because they cannot start earlier, we do expect a reasonable amount of extra work to be done – in full consultation with the teams, with FOM, and everybody else.

“And hopefully that will then lead to some refinements that would be submitted to the World Council maybe bit later in the year, and hopefully approved.”

Tombazis acknowledged that teams believe that as the regulations stand 2026 F1 cars will be potentially matching current F2 speeds.

“I think the fears are accurate because people are taking a snapshot of what the regulations on a piece of paper are now, and are making comments on the basis of what they see,” he said.

“So I don’t have any concern about these issues raised by people, but clearly as I explained at the start, we have full expectation to make some steps up for performance, and that’s exactly why we’ve set the bar reasonably low to start with, so we can build up on that, with collaboration of the teams.

“And to increase the downforce of these cars, is actually quite easy, if you have the regulatory freedom, I mean, and that’s exactly the step we want to take. 

“So I understand the comments. I don’t think there’s any concern these cars will be not faster than F2 or anything like that. I think that would be 100% resolved by the time we are in the final regs.”

FIA single seater technical director Jan Monchaux insisted that the views of the teams are being taken into account.

“We are still in discussion, and we are always in discussion with the teams,” said the former Sauber technical director.

“They have expressed concerns. Typically, teams are always a bit reluctant at implementing large changes, so it’s a bit of an ongoing compromise that needs to constantly be found.”

Monchaux stressed that it’s better to start with restrictive regulations, especially on the aerodynamic side, and then give the teams more freedom.

 “As Nikolas said effectively the approach we had since we needed to respect the framework, in terms of date of publication,” he noted.

“The regulations as they have been presented now, and which hopefully will be voted, are probably the most restrictive teams will be seeing, because we think also it’s going to be far easier in the next months to start increasing the freedom, and review some aspect of the regulation, which potentially currently are far too constrained, then the other way around, because they will all agree on having more freedom.

“If we had gone the other way around and effectively, let’s say, have something like providing a lot of freedom in their ability to design the cars, we would potentially realise in October or November on that one we don’t necessarily want, because it might put at risk some of the targets we want to achieve with these new regs.

“So it’s simply the approach we think is more reasonable to effectively now, step-by-step, since we have, I think, a solid basis to start discussion, to review some areas where, for the moment, we offer little or no freedom.

“Then if we convince ourselves, with the active support of the teams, to potentially say, ‘Okay, in this area, you can do more, it’s okay for us, you have more freedom,’ because we are convinced, through work they will have to do that it’s not going to put at risk all the high level objectives – the nimble car, which comes with reduction of weight, which comes with some reduction of downforce.

“And I think the process like this will be working, because it’s pretty much straightforward, because they will always say yes for more freedom.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Fry: Why 2026 F1 regs need more work

Pat Fry says that the 2026 F1 regs still need a lot of work
Williams chief technical officer Pat Fry says that that 2026 Formula 1 technical regulations still need some fine-tuning.

On Thursday the FIA released details of the rules as they currently stand despite some key topics still being under discussion with teams.

The regulations are due to be finalised and approved by the World Motor Sport Council at the end of this month.

The new cars will feature movable front and rear wings in order to reduce drag on the straights.

They will also be 30kgs lighter than the current models, despite the overall weight of the power unit/battery increasing.

“It’s got its challenges,” Fry said when asked by this writer about the 2026 package. “I think aero-wise, I don’t think we’re a million miles off.

“Yes, it is very light on downforce at the moment, but it’s very easy to scale it slightly and get to somewhere which could be workable.

“I guess we engineers always moan about the restrictions, and how heavily prescribed it is. It is massively heavily prescribed.

“But again, that, I think it’s relatively straightforward. I guess the FIA have gone in, ‘this is what we want,’ written some rules, and you’ve got to give us some scope to actually adjust them.

“There’s quite a lot of flow structure challenges that we need some freedom to try and fix. But I think it’s more important that we try and keep the thing on track, so that we’re still closing in on something at the end of this month.”

Fry says that it will be difficult for teams to achieve the weight limit.

“There’s other challenges with the rules, particularly on the weight side of things,” he noted.

“We’ve got to make sure that the driver weight is sensible, and that we don’t compromise the heavier drivers, which was initially in there, then they backtracked on it. So we want to get that back.

“And the size of the weight challenge is absolutely massive. It’s quite a heavy power unit, battery pack, all of that side of things, it is a monumental challenge.

“The load tests are going up massively, so you’re going to have to add weight in. So that doesn’t come easily.”

Fry suggested that the weight limit was still a topic for discussion: “That is something where I think we need to be sensible, and compromise.

“And it’s almost as if we’re driving blindly down, ‘well if we can make the car lighter, it will go quicker,’ and ignoring the fact that hardly anyone’s ever going to get anywhere close to it.

“And obviously, the closer you get, the more expensive it gets. So you almost need to come up with a target that is hard but achievable, and then drive it down year-after-year afterwards. So have like an escalator or something to recover it.”

“The load tests are going up massively, so you’re going to have to add weight in. So that doesn’t come easily.”

Fry says there is still work to be done on the aero regulations, which have been honed after early simulations indicated that the cars would run put of electrical power on the straights.

“I think we just need to learn,” he said. “It is obviously moving performance away from aero, but that’s all part of it, isn’t it?

“In terms of all the freedom you need to keep a car balanced for the different drag modes or something, it’s getting on workable. But again, we need to make sure we’ve actually got the flexibility there for that to be sensible.

“I think it’s not the disaster it was looking like right at the start, there were quite a few teams saying it was an absolute disaster. Yeah, it’s a challenge, but I wouldn’t say it’s a non-starter.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Verstappen: Why Monaco was a “wake-up call” for Red Bull

Verstappen remains confident that RBR can improve kerb riding within this season

Max Verstappen admits that the Monaco GP was a “wake-up call” for his Red Bull Formula 1 team as the RB20’s weakness over bumps and kerbs was highlighted.

The Dutchman admits that the issue has been a characteristic of the team’s package since the start of the ground effect era in 2022, and that the increasing competitiveness of rivals has now exposed it.

Verstappen had a poor weekend in Monaco, qualifying and finishing sixth, and the Canadian GP could also be challenging for the team.

“This is something that we know is not our favourite thing in the world,” Verstappen said of the issue.

“But it’s something that we’re working on to try and make better. And this takes time. This is not something that is solved from one to the other week, but for sure, we’ll try to optimise things.

“It’s been a problem since day one of the new regulations. And this is something that we haven’t been able to fix it yet. I do think that after Monaco, it gave us another wake-up call. And yeah, we had a lot of good meetings, I think at the factory, and discussions. I feel like there’s a bit more focus on that now to try and improve that.

“Because I feel like of course with everyone catching up naturally you can’t rely on your advantage anymore, even though your kerb riding is bad, or whatever. So it definitely needs to be fixed.”

Verstappen admitted that it’s not easy to address such issues during a season, but he remains confident that it can be improved.

“It just takes a bit of time to really make, let’s say, big changes on the car, because some things are designed, and they might need to get redesigned or whatever,” he said. “You can’t do that with the budget cap within one or two weeks.”

“I still think that we can do a good job this year if everything works out. But at the moment we have to try a few thing, see what works best, and then for sure.

“I think maybe some things will be different next year that maybe are a bit more difficult to let’s say redesign this year, but I’m still hopeful and confident that we can do a better job already this year.

Asked if the Red Bull simulator doesn’t recreate bumps and kerns accurately enough he said: “Maybe on the simulator, they are probably too good. And yeah, it gives you a bit of a wrong idea of how to set up the car. But some tracks I think we do a better job than others.

“But honestly, I think if you ask everyone, that’s the same, it’s very hard to nail it all the time. But it’s still a good tool, I think. And it does help us, and we can try a lot of stuff on the simulator. But yeah, some tracks work a bit better than others.”

Verstappen says he’s paying no attention to suggestions that Ferrari and McLaren are now in the title fight.

“I just try to focus on what we have here,” he said. “I think we have plenty to work on. We knew that already. But naturally after Monaco I think we have a good direction to work in. And that’s actually quite exciting.

“I’m not focused on what the others are doing, because it’s just a waste of time and energy. And we know that from our side, there are things that we can do better, and that’s what we’ll focus on.

“And I’m sure that if we do those things well we still have a very, very strong team.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Russell: 2026 F1 straightline speed will create safety concerns

Russell has highlighted the high straightline speeds of the 2026 F1 cars

Mercedes driver George Russell says that the high straightline speeds that the 2026 Formula 1 regulations will generate will create a safety challenge for the sport.

The new cars will feature active front and rear wings that will reduce downforce on the straights and create higher speeds than seen under the current rules.

Improved safety is already part of the 2026 rules package, but GPDA director Russell says that standards will have to keep up with the increased speeds.

“I think the cars are going to take a quite a big turn in terms of how they perform,” he said. “They’re going to be exceptionally quick in the straights, 360 probably most tracks, which is pretty impressive.

“Obviously then the safety needs to be probably improved, because having a crash at 360/370, is going to be pretty crazy.

“But then the cornering speeds are going to be massively reduced. So I’m sure the teams will find a way to bring that closer to where we’ve been recently.

Asked to elaborate on the safety aspects he said: “I think when it comes to safety unfortunately, history has told us that incidents need to happen before changes are made and everybody needs to be doing a really thorough job ahead of these regulations, because the cars are going to be so quick.

“It’s going to have so little downforce in the straights, it’s almost going to feel like probably you’re floating, you’re just flying through the air.

“Then you can imagine in a race that starts raining, and you’re on slick tyres, and you’re doing 250mph, you’re on a street circuit, that’s going to be a bit of a sketchy place to be. So these are questions that need to be answered.

“And to be fair to the FIA, they are fully aware of this, and on top of this, and they’re looking at all of the possible scenarios of what could happen. So time will tell, but the cars are already fast as they are, suddenly, where do we stop, are we going to get to 400 km/h?

“Do the fans really need or want to see this? What is it that we want to achieve? For me, it’s, it’s good racing. I don’t really mind too much about how quick the cars are around the track, you want to have good racing, hard racing, and strong competition, ideally, between every team every driver.”

Russell also harked back to the last regulations that ended in 2021, suggested that he preferred those cars/

“From a driving standpoint, you want the fastest cars, you want to feel like you’re a fighter jet,” he said.

“And in 2020-’21, that’s how it felt. Now these cars are getting very quick again, in this current era, and I’m sure next year, maybe it’s even going to be battling 2020 lap times that we were seeing.

“It would be a shame to lose some of that performance of the car. But on the flip side, it will improve the race if there’s less downforce and there’s less dirty air. I think to conclude with that, you can’t have it all. And you’ve got to choose your battles.”

Russell also made some interesting observations about the progress Mercedes is making with its 2026 engine, and drawing on experience within the organisation gained with other projects.

“I think the PU regs are exciting,” he said. “And I think that the manufacturers are going to take strides over these years in the development, we already see it within Mercedes.

“The progress we’re making is looking really promising at the moment with the sustainable fuel, with Petronas and the experience the team had from Formula E, and even the hypercar project that the team did eight years ago, not knowing eight years ago that it was going to be beneficial for the future. So that’s really interesting.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Alonso: 30kgs F1 weight cut for 2026 is “impossible”

The FIA released the first images of its take on the 2026 regulations today

Fernando Alonso says that trimming 30kgs from the 2026 Formula 1 cars currently looks “impossible” – however he expects the teams will be able to manage it by the time the new designs actually race.

As part of the package the minimum weight limit will be trimmed from the current 798kgs to 768kgs.

While the cars will also be shorter and narrower Alonso believes that battery weight will be major factor, and make it harder for teams to slim their cars down.

“From a driver point of view, what we want is just close competition, multiple race winners, opportunities for everyone,” he said when asked by this writer about the 2026 regulations.

“We don’t want to have domination of three, four years, where only one team, one driver or two drivers can win. So hopefully 2026 can kind of help on that, which is the only thing that F1 is missing. The rest is great.”

Regarding the active aero package intended to improve speed on the straight he said: “It looks complicated. At the end of the day, the fans are the ones that need to say their point of view, I think, for us it is just extra maybe work on the steering wheel or different buttons to press.

“Definitely the technology and complexity of the cars are quite high at the moment. It doesn’t look that it will be less in 2026. Also the engines, obviously, they are very ambitious in terms of targets.

“And maybe some of these aero devices and things that you need to change on the straights and things like that are just to compensate the maybe too ambitious power unit targets.”

Alonso made it clear that making the weight limit will be a challenge for the teams.

“I think it is impossible probably to achieve 30 kilos already,” he said. “The thing is that if you put the power unit being 50% electric, and you need the batteries to support that, the cars and the tyres I think are heavier as well. Cars will just increase 20 or 30 kilos because of the power unit.

“And then you want to reduce 30, you need to drop 60 kilos of the current car, which is it seems at the moment probably to the teams an impossible target.

“They have two years to achieve that target, and as always in F1, what is impossible in 2024 will become reality in 2026, because there are very clever people in the teams. But I think all is a consequence of something else that is in the car.”

Alonso says he welcomes the “manual override mode” that in effect replaces DRS as a way to create overtaking opportunities, and gives the drivers an extra took with which to play.

“It was the same before where we had the KERS active for six seconds, and you had to choose where in the corners and in the lap you use those six seconds, and sometimes you used in different places than the car in front and vice versa, and created some overtaking opportunities.

“So I tend to agree with having kind of freedom to the drivers to use you the power here or there, and create alternative strategies, which now we are all deploying in the same places, at the same time, and it’s a little bit more routine.”

Overall Alonso believes that teams should have more freedom.

“I think it should be more simple,” he said. “It should be maybe more just pure racing and just more down to the drivers and to the team and the specific setup at the specific racetrack, while remembering in the past more freedom into the design of the cars – some F1 cars had six wheels, just to give an example. And in some tracks maybe benefits you in some others you know you will get hurt.

“Same when we had Michelin and Bridgestone tyres in 2005. Maybe a difficult season for Bridgestone if Michelins were better, maybe rain here in Montreal and the Intermediate tyres are great for Bridgestone, and all the Bridgestone cars, they can win the race, or be on the podium.

“So I like that kind of freedom that you can choose something. And it’s not just dictated everything by the regulations. But this is a personal point of view, and everyone will have theirs, and I’m happy, I will adapt.

“And the most important thing is that you have the fastest car. And that’s what we need to work on.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized