Christian Horner: “A quick car abuses the tyres more…”

Christian Horner says he doesn’t know why Red Bull lost performance in China after being so strong in the first two races, but expects form to ebb and flow each weekend.

It was lack of one-lap pace relative to the opposition that ultimate tipped RBR towards starting on the medium tyre and using the soft at the end.

“I’m not sure, to be honest with you,” said Horner when asked about the car’s Shanghai form. “The last couple of years this track hasn’t been out strongest. It has a heavy emphasis on front wear and degradation, you tend to be front limited here rather than rear. So we’ll see next weekend whether things move around in Bahrain.

“I think we’re seeing that qualifying is paying less of a premium than trying to preserve the tyres. Our car performs very, very well, it’s a quick car, but a quick car abuses the tyre more, and the tyres can’t cope with that.

“Obviously then we have to adapt our approach and set-up and the way that we operate the car to ensure that we get more out of the tyres. It’s the same for everybody, it’s just a different way of going about things.”

Meanwhile Horner insisted that Vettel would have been at least third in China had he not got caught behind Nico Hulkenberg in the opening stint.

“Seb managed to pass Jenson, who he knew he had to clear quickly, but then Hulkenberg cruised past both of them, and that cost him quite a bit of time in that first stint.

“If Sebastian had found one more second in that first stint and not been locked up behind him his race would have been quite different. He would certainly have been on the podium, and maybe even second. I think it was the right thing to do, it was worth giving it a go.”



Filed under Uncategorized

2 responses to “Christian Horner: “A quick car abuses the tyres more…”

  1. **Paul**

    Red Bulls policy of designing a car which is fast over the course of most tracks, but not in a straight line, always costs them at China, and Monza to some degree too.

    It was telling that Vettel could barely hold off a Force India after passing it with his DRS open, and pressumibly KERS. The fact the Force India looked like it, in non DRS mode, perhaps had the pace to repass on the same straight was a great demonstration of why RBR are quick in races, but struggle to pass cars in front. Hulkenburg’s top end speed on the straight was about the same at Vettels with DRS.

    It’ll pay dividends for Red Bull at tracks with shorter straights, but it’s same old same old for RBR in the car design stakes. I must confess, if I were a driver, having a car with lower top speed than any of it’s rivals on straights would frustrate me hugely, especially if utilising the pace it has in corners destroys the tyres this year.

    I think Ferrari have hit the sweet spot with car design, not too agressive on tyres, but fast enough, and certainly fast in a straight line. Not that Fernando would ever admit to having the best package on the grid, the many loves the underdog card !

  2. Stone the Crows

    This race appeared to be easier on the rear tyres than the fronts, which is opposite of what the previouis two tracks have been. This situation certainly fit into Ferrari’s strengths well, hopefully they will be able to repeat this on sunday, but I’m doubtful, I think Red Bull will be back on top because the track and the tyre selection will better suit their cars.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s