Marussia bid “lacked substance” says Force India’s Fernley

Marussia’s application to run its 2014 car this season was rejected by the F1 Strategy Group because it lacked substance and had compliance issues, according to Force India team principal Robert Fernley.

It’s understood that one of the compliance issues related to the fact that the letter came from team CEO Graeme Lowdon, and not from the administrator, as should have been the case.

The brief letter also contained little or no information about the team’s future plans, such as a possible new owner or investor, or any intention to ready a 2015 car. As such some of those present at the meeting, including Bernie Ecclestone, did not believe that the team – whose Banbury factory has been sold to Haas – had a chance of mounting a credible entry into the 2015 championship.

In order to grant permission to Marussia, unanimity was required. Force India was the first to vote, and as soon as the team responded with a ‘No’ in effect it didn’t matter what anyone else had to say. It’s understood that others also expressed opposition, as would other teams not represented in the meeting, such as Sauber and Lotus, who would have had a vote had the matter proceeded to the F1 Commission. Apparently the discussion on the subject was relatively brief.

“The strategy group was faced with an application for Marussia’s 2014 cars to compete in the 2015 championship,” said Fernley. “During the meeting it emerged that there were compliance issues and that the application lacked substance. Equally, the speculative application submitted contained no supporting documentation to reinforce the case for offering special dispensation.

“For example, no details were supplied of who the new owners would be or the operational structures that would be put in place. Given the lack of information, uncertain guarantees, and the speculative nature of the application, the decision was taken that it is better to focus on ensuring the continued participation of the remaining independent teams.”

The Strategy Group includes Mercedes, Ferrari, Red Bull, McLaren and Williams on a permanent basis, as well as the next best placed constructor, which this year is Force India. Each team has a vote, while the FIA has six votes and Formula One Management has six votes.

Those at the meeting included Ecclestone, Jean Todt, Toto Wolff and Niki Lauda (Mercedes), Ron Dennis and Eric Boullier (McLaren), Sergio Marchionne and Maurizio Arrivabene (Ferrari), Christian Horner (Red Bull), Claire Williams (Williams) and Fernley.


Filed under F1, F1 News, Grand Prix News

3 responses to “Marussia bid “lacked substance” says Force India’s Fernley

  1. Mick

    Makes sense. If there isn’t a credible plan on the table to keep the team running beyond the 2015 season then letting them run 2015 in a non-compliant car is pointless. They won’t be able to come close to competing with any other team. Sound like it was just a stab in the dark to allow the release of the 2014 prize money. I do think that the prize money should now be used to pay Marussia’s creditors rather than be shared among other teams or kept by Bernie & co.

  2. Roland

    Crikey, Force India claiming Marussia/Manor lack substance, at least their backers aren’t in jail! Definitely agree Marussia prize money should be used to pay creditors if the team doesn’t survive.

    Bernie needs to take all this on board as *his* problem, F1 isn’t attracting sponsors and therefore few want to get involved in wanting to run F1 Teams. I imagine when the cars – whichever ones are around – get to Melbourne there may be a few more sponsor decals than shown at Jerez, but I’m certain none of the cars will be weighted down with too many sponsors!

  3. CTP

    Great job getting to the bottom of a potentially misleading headline, thanks.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s