Tag Archives: Max Verstappen

McLaren’s quick response to Norris car failure shows how far F1 has come

In past decades mechanical failures were common – and often impacted F1 title battles

For drivers and teams success in Formula 1 is all about learning, and not repeating mistakes or failures.

A classic example occurred at the 2005 European GP at the Nurburgring, when leader Kimi Raikkonen picked up a serious vibration after getting a flat spot.

After a discussion with the McLaren pit wall the Finn opted to stay out, and all was well – until he suffered a spectacular suspension failure at the start of the last lap, and spun out of the race.

The Woking team realised too late that the vibration has tipped things over the edge in terms of what the suspension could take.

As part of its response it introduced a system with a metric that equated the vibration level and the risk of failure, and which set a level beyond which a pit stop for new tyres was essential. That soon became standard practice up and down the pitlane.

Twenty years on the same McLaren team had to react after Lando Norris suffered an oil line issue in Zandvoort.

Given that the Italian GP was fast approaching the engineers wasted little time in coming up with a fix and manufacturing sufficient examples to ensure that both cars can get through the Monza weekend without any concerns of a repeat.

The update comes too late for Norris, who lost a priceless 18-points in the nip and tuck battle with his team mate Oscar Piastri. Andrea Stella was quick to apologise publicly, and he was keen to point out that the team didn’t want to impact so directly the title chances of one or other of its drivers.

To his credit Norris realised even as he sat in his stranded car and reported the failure that it was an occurrence that he couldn’t control. Given that he’s benefited immensely from the team’s usual bulletproof reliability in recent seasons it wasn’t something to lead him to throw his toys out of the pram.

“It’s just something that happens,” he said in Monza on Thursday. “It’s not Andrea’s fault. It’s not Zak’s fault. We look back on, I think it was 60-something races without a technical failure, without any issues. I think that’s a record for ourselves. I don’t know if it’s a record in F1, but it’s something we’re pretty proud about.

“So for that to happen now, that’s just being unlucky. It wasn’t a bad job by anyone. It was just various things coming together, and then just being unlucky.”

The reason that the failure got so much attention was because such high profile mechanical retirements, especially ones that impact a title battle, are so rare these days.

Contrast that with just 20 years ago. Aside from the tyre-induced suspension failure at the Nurburgring Raikkonen also lost wins to a driveshaft failure at Imola, and to a hydraulics issue at Spa. Throw in four 10-place grid penalties caused by practice engine blow-ups and you can pretty soon account for why a man who won seven races lost that year’s title to Renault’s Fernando Alonso.

The world has changed because McLaren and the other teams and PU suppliers have become so good at not leaving anything to chance at the design stage, and then quickly addressing issues if they do occur, usually in the privacy of rig or dyno testing and so on.

McLaren COO Piers Thynne, the man who in effect runs the factory operation, is proud of the way the team responded this week.

“Reliability is an extremely important topic in F1,” he said on Friday. “It was an unfortunate incident when we broke our chain of positive reliability.

“The team has reacted extremely well and extremely pragmatically to look at the issue, find the root cause, understand it, and manufacture parts that are extremely focussed to ensure that it doesn’t happen again.

“I’m extremely pleased with the reaction of the team. And certainly the factory, both design and manufacturing, reacted in a very positive and pragmatic way.”

Firefighting an issue like that is a good test of any organisation, and lessons can always be absorbed on how to respond even more effectively next time.

“F1 is about learning every single day, day shift, night shift, every time we run the car,” said Thynne. “And learning and trialling and improving and improving your process to react positively when things like this happen. It evolves every time.

“I think it’s really important, the human reaction to the problem. It was positive, it was learning, it was collaborative, and shows that our focus is absolutely in the right place.

“What we need to make sure is that we are diligent and focussed to ensure that it doesn’t happen again. But the solution that is here this weekend to prevent it from happening again is the right one.”

Norris is well aware that he’s benefited from that sort of diligence, and he was equally impressed with the subsequent reaction.

“Sixty races or 60-plus I think of zero faults and failures – obviously little, minor things here and there, but nothing which has cost me points or my team mate points – it’s pretty impressive.

“It’s F1, these things happen. There’s a lot of insanely complicated things that have to come together. For them the diagnostic of what happened is pretty easy – it’s the part that’s broken. But the understanding of how to fix it – they made the same part, but stronger.

“The race in F1 is always about making things lighter and stronger. there’s probably a very, very small weight penalty that comes with this part, but it’s a pretty small part.

“It’s probably something that costs a little bit to make, but the team have just done an incredibly good job.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Permane: Hadjar’s focus shows he has the potential to become a great

Hadjar’s third place in Zandvoort was mighty impressive and hinted at real potential

Isack Hadjar’s superb run to third place in the Dutch GP was a highlight of the Zandvoort weekend, and just the latest in a series of impressive performances by the Frenchman.

His strong form has made him an obvious candidate for a promotion to the hot seat at Red Bull Racing, sooner or later. It will be then be up to him to prove that he could be one day be in the Vettel or Verstappen league.

Since his disastrous start to the season in Melbourne he has got better and better, consistently making it to Q3 and usually feeling a little bit frustrated to be “only” seventh or eighth on the grid.

Indeed last weekend he joked that he was finally happy to be as high as fourth….

What made his performance all the more noteworthy was that his FP1 session was compromised by a PU issue which subsequently caused him to lose the whole of FP2.

He went into Sunday’s race relying on long run data gathered by team mate Liam Lawson, as he’d been denied the opportunity to do his own homework.

However he put any frustrations behind him, and simply got on with the job. Under the most intense pressure, and in a race made complicated by safety cars and restarts, he didn’t put a foot wrong. The retirement of Lando Norris gifted him a place, but he’d done the rest himself.

“He drove a perfect race,” Racing Bulls team principal Alan Permane told me. “And it actually all started Friday night, overnight, because he was struggling with the car on Friday.

“And between his engineers, himself and the simulator back in the UK, they put together a really good setup for P3 which then, of course, worked in quali. We extracted the most out of it.

“He did no laps in P2 at all. But honestly, we were pretty confident with our race pace. Liam had shown decent race pace, so we weren’t very worried about that.

“And in the race, it was fantastic – to be able to race and beat the Ferraris and beat the Mercedes was very impressive.”

The fact that he was able to put his Friday disaster behind him is what really impressed Permane, who has worked with the likes of Michael Schumacher and Fernando Alonso.

“One of the things that separates the great from the good is that they’re able to just focus on what’s in front of them,” he noted.

“So he had an awful day on Friday. He was just able to put that out of his mind and get on with it. And that’s that shows real character. I think that shows that he’s got at least part of what it takes to get to the very top, for sure.”

Racing Bulls CEO Peter Bayer was equally impressed by the young Frenchman’s performance, especially in such stellar company at the front of the field.

“He didn’t put a foot wrong honestly, the whole race,” he told me. “And we were a bit nervous, to be honest, before the start. Because of the technical issues, we didn’t have all the long run data we were hoping to have.

“But we were quite convinced that we can go with the one-stop. The team put a car together which was magic honestly, in terms of pace. He easily kept the Ferraris behind, he kept the Mercedes behind, and he was on par with Max.

“Honestly, [at the front] it’s different. You feel that everything becomes ultra precise, and you know that every tiny error will immediately cost you a position. And Charles was putting a lot of pressure, actually twice, with all the restarts. But Isack was racing like a big boy today!

“Obviously with Isack we see how quickly he’s picking up pace. He had no FP2. It takes some talent, it takes a lot of hard work, dedication and focus. And that’s what he shows on a daily basis.”

However Bayer hadn’t forgotten that Lawson was unlucky, and should have been well inside the top 10.

“I think here the third consecutive race where we had both cars in Q3,” said Bayer. “We think the car has the ability to be quick on almost every track. Honestly, Liam was on the hunt for big points as well, but unfortunately he got taken out by Carlos.”

Permane is also encouraged by the potential of the VCARB 02, which has been consistently competitive everywhere of late.

“We’ve got a very good car,” he said. “We look at this championship one race at a time, and we know that if at the track the guys at the track operate in a perfect way, which they have done this weekend, we will do well – and we have a very good chance to beat all our midfield rivals.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Racing Bulls boss: Verstappen trying our car is “like me flying to the moon…”

Isack Hadjar’s podium has ramped up speculation about what Verstappen could do with the VCARB

Even before Isack Hadjar’s spectacular run to third place in the Dutch GP speculation was rife about what Max Verstappen could do if he was at the wheel of the VCARB 02.

The fact that rookie Hadjar finished the Zandvoort race in the wheel tracks of the World Champion only added to the intrigue.

Even Fernando Alonso joined in the fun, suggesting that the Dutchman would be fighting for the World Championship if he was at the wheel of the sister team’s car.

In theory Verstappen could have a run in an FP1 session just to get a feel for where the Faenza car is better or worse than his own, and he could provide both his own team and Racing Bulls with some useful feedback.

A straight swap could also allow Hadjar to have an FP1 session in a Red Bull, giving the main team a little taster of his talent ahead of any decision over next season.

You could also argue that it’s something that is more likely to be green lit with former Racing Bulls boss Laurent Mekies in charge than it would have been under Christian Horner.

However Max swapping over even for a single session could also be a very public admission that RBR hasn’t done a good enough job of late, as well as providing fuel for rivals who already think that there’s a little too much co-operation between the two teams, notwithstanding the fact that Liam Lawson and Yuki Tsunoda have swapped back and forward.

An FP1 session would be one thing, but at the other end of the scale is the enticing but highly improbable prospect of Verstappen actually spending a whole weekend with Racing Bulls.

It’s a great idea for fans to ponder over, and it would be a huge PR story for the sport, and for the overall Red Bull organisation.

Even F1 boss Stefano Domenicali admitted it would be fun when joking about the suggestion with journalists after the Dutch GP.

However the Racing Bulls camp insists that even a test is not on the horizon for Verstappen.

“I guess we are joking about it, as everybody else does,” CEO Peter Bayer told me after Hadjar’s third place at Zandvoort. “But at the end of the day, we’re two teams that operate differently, and it’s not really a question. It’s more like a running gag for everyone.”

But couldn’t it be considered at the end of the year, when there are no championship positions at stake?

“The thing is in F1 always everything is at stake. It’s about making things predictable, not putting things in jeopardy. It’s not considered, it’s not discussed. It’s not happening.

“I think we’ve been working so hard to develop our identity, and to move Racing Bulls up. It’s not an option to me. It sounds like me flying to the moon. It’s just not something that will happen…”

Team principal Alan Permane also insisted that it’s not even on the radar.

“It’s not, honestly,” he told me. “We’re just focused on our own thing. That’s something that you guys chat about.

“Someone asked me at the weekend, is Max going to get in it for a P1 session? And of course, he’s not. We’re just focused on getting the most out of it, as Red Bull are focused on getting the most out of their car.”

Permane says it wouldn’t even be an option at the post-season Abu Dhabi tyre test: “Not really. I think what’s more interesting will be us learning about next year’s tyres, which is what we’ll do at that test at the end of the year. So there’s plenty of serious stuff to do.”

There is a precedent of sorts – back in 1994 Michael Schumacher had a test with Benetton’s then sister team Ligier, essentially get a feel for the Renault V10 he’d be using the following year.

However he refused to give the French outfit any feedback on what he thought about the chassis, much to the frustration of the engineers who had arranged the test.

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

How Sainz and Lawson lost their shot at Zandvoort points – and blamed each other

Their collision was already costly, and then a penalty rubbed salt into Sainz’s wounds

While some drivers enjoyed perfect afternoons in Zandvoort for Carlos Sainz and Liam Lawson a clash after the first safety car restart proved very expensive.

Both men had to crawl round to the pits with punctures, while Sainz also needed a new nose.

They both dropped to the back of the field, and then to add insult to injury the FIA stewards deemed that Sainz was handed a 10-second penalty, which he had to take at a subsequent pit stop.

They decreed “that car 30 had the right to the corner and therefore car 55 was wholly or predominantly to blame for the collision,” a view that Sainz inevitably disagreed with, and which left him fuming.

Having called Lawson “stupid” at the time he reined it in a bit after the race. However he hadn’t changed his perspective on the shunt which he felt had cost him the chance to finish as high as P5, the position occupied by team mate Alex Albon, and who has behind him when the collision occurred.

“It’s a corner that allows two cars to race each other without really having to have any unnecessary contact,” he said when I asked him about it. “But with Liam, it always seems to be very difficult to make that happen.

“He always seems to prefer to have a bit of contact and risk a DNF or a puncture like we did, than to actually accept having two cars side-by-side, which hopefully it will come with more experience to him, because he knows he’s putting too many points on the line just for an unnecessary manoeuvre, like he did.

“But on top of that, to then get a 10-second penalty for it, I think it’s a complete joke. Honestly, I need to go now to the stewards just to get an explanation, to see what is their point of view of the incident.

“Because it’s unacceptable, I think it’s not the level of stewarding that F1 needs if they are really considering that to be a 10-second penalty. On my behalf, I think it’s a serious matter now that concerns me as a driver, as a GPDA director, and something that I will make sure I raise.”

He added: “It’s something that is very concerning. I’m talking as calmly and with eloquently and trying to pick my words in the best possible way, without trying to put here about a bad word for anyone.

“But what I’ve seen today and what I’ve suffered today is something that concerns me, for myself, but for the other drivers and for motorsport in general, if they really think this is how a penalty should be applied to the guy that is around the outside, I don’t know.”

He was adamant that Lawson was at fault, and that he wasn’t even attempting to pass at that point.

“I wasn’t even really trying to race Liam that hard. I just had a gap around the outside, and so I’m going to start getting him a bit out of position for Turn 2, Turn 3. I wasn’t trying to pass him around the outside.

“I was just trying to have a side-by-side with him to then get him a bit of line for Turn 2, Turn 3, and then suddenly I have a contact, which caught me completely off-guard and by surprise.

“You need to pick your battles. And probably Liam in his first years now, if he’s deciding to have a bit this approach of crash or no overtake, it’s something I’ll keep in keep in mind.

“But the story of my season so far again, a race where I could have finished P5 where Alex is, another 10 points that for something that I cannot understand and is out of our hands.”

Regarding the contact he added: “I’ve raced Lewis, I’ve raced Checo, I’ve raced Oscar, I’ve raced Charles, I’ve raced so many drivers doing the move I did today, so many other cars in the last four years – at the start, racing around inside, outside, high banking, low banking, without really having contact.

“If the guy in the inside doesn’t want to have contact, if the guy in the inside decides to open the wheel and create a contact or risk a contact, then it’s on their behalf, but for the guy on the outside to receive a penalty for it is what concerns me the most.”

Inevitably the two drivers had opposing views on the contact and how it should have been treated by the FIA.

Lawson wasn’t impressed when I told him how unhappy Sainz was with what had transpired.

“I’m sure he’s not,” said the Kiwi. “Obviously I’m not stoked either, it ruined my day. The rules are written as they are, and we know how they’re written.

“And I’ve been on the receiving end this year as well, where I was going for an overtake and thought that I should be given space, and I wasn’t, and I got a penalty.

“So it’s something that we learn from. We all know this. It’s lap one on a restart, it’s super slippery, cold tyres. It’s fine to go for the move, but it’s just risky. And we made concept, which is not ideal, but that’s why he got a penalty.”

Lawson was adamant that he wasn’t the guilty party.

“I think he was overtaking me today, and I also think he got a penalty today. So he can make all the comments in the world he likes. I wish he’d just come and talk to me about it rather than telling everybody else.

“But if it was my fault, I would have got a penalty. I understand his frustration. We don’t want to be in these situations. And as I said, I’ve been on the receiving end as well. It’s just the way the rules are written. And we all know that.”

The collision proved just as costly for Lawson as it was for Sainz, and while he eventually recovered to P12 he missed a shot at finishing within a couple of places of team mate Isack Hadjar.

“We were I guess behind George before everything happened. And the car has been very, very strong. So there’s no reason why we wouldn’t have come home with very strong points today.

“We were just consistent in the first stint, sort of managing. A restart is always aggressive and tough. And obviously it’s time for opportunities. But something that risky when we’re both in the points like that, it just sucks….”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Why Zandvoort failure will allow Norris to “chill out” and “just go for it…”

His title hopes took a huge knock in Zandvoort but Norris is keen to move on

A Formula 1 World Championship campaign is made up of 24 race weekends, and they all count. However if Lando Norris does eventually lose out to McLaren team mate Oscar Piastri by a margin of fewer than 18 points then his mechanical retirement in Zandvoort will perhaps be remembered as the unluckiest break of his season.

Failures are rare amongst the frontrunning teams these days, but down the years the destination of many titles has swung on the basis of retirement or two here or there.

What was perhaps most impressive was Norris’s calm demeanour on team radio as he coasted to a stop and prepared to abandon the car.

In effect the fact that he had done nothing wrong allowed him to quickly accept that it pure bad luck had just robbed him of second place and 18 points, and there was nothing he could do about it.

And intriguingly he also suggested that his title hopes took such a big knock, and Piastri has such a large lead, that he now has less to lose.

“It wasn’t my fault, so nothing I can really do,” he said when I asked about his measured response to the failure.

“Just not my weekend, a little bit unlucky yesterday with the wind and unlucky today. So nothing much. Out of my control.

“So a tough one. Of course it’s frustrating. It hurts a bit in just for sure, in the championship point of view, it’s a lot of points to lose so quickly and so easily. But, yeah, nothing I can control now, so just take it on the chin and move on.”

The McLaren drivers have benefited from bulletproof reliability on the chassis and Pu side in recent seasons. So was it perhaps inevitable that eventually something would go awry? Norris didn’t see it that way.

“Not even, because I think the team and HPP have done a very good job over the last two years. I think we’ve had pretty mu,ch minimal… This might be the first one that I can remember that’s cost us any points or anything at all.

“So it’s not even inevitable at like this point, because everyone works to such high standards, we don’t expect anything, really. So that’s why it’s more again just unlucky.

“It’s not like in the olden days, when used to pretty much blow up every other race. I don’t think it is inevitable, but we don’t expect it nowadays, so it’s just, yeah, frustrating, unlucky. And that’s it.”

Piastri’s lead has now grown to a healthy 34 points, and while we still have nine weekends to go – including a few sprints – it’s starting to look like a difficult task for Norris.

“The only thing I can do is try to win every race!,” he said. “That’s going to be difficult, but I’ll make sure I give it everything I can. I thought honestly this weekend was good, it wasn’t by ever much, and I didn’t lose out by much in quali, but I felt always pretty on top of things, and a couple little areas to improve on.

“But if it wasn’t for a little gust of wind down the start/finish yesterday, I’d be on pole, and I’m sure the race would have looked a bit different today. The pace was very strong today.

“So there are so many positives. It’s just close. I have a good teammate. He’s strong, he’s quick in every situation, every scenario. So it’s hard to get things back on someone who’s just good in pretty much every situation.

“But today is a different situation. It’s just unlucky. It’s not my fault, and sometimes that’s just racing.

“It certainly hasn’t helped the [title] race. It’s only made it harder for me, and put me under more pressure. But it’s almost a big enough gap now that I can just chill out about it and just go for it…”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

How Zandvoort F1 qualifying exposed a Williams tyre weakness

Albon couldn’t get tyre temperature when it mattered in Q2 at Zandvoort

Qualifying for the Dutch GP was a tricky affair for everyone, with gusts of wind catching many people out on top of the challenge of getting the tyres into just the right window.

It wasn’t easy to put all the pieces together, and just as Isack Hadjar got it spectacularly right in P4, so some others were a little bit out of position.

Among them was Alex Albon, who was as high as P6 in Q1 but then tumbled to a lowly P15 after a difficult final run in Q2.

The Williams driver was quick to flag a tyre temperature issues on team radio. Afterwards he gave a fascinating insight into the challenge of getting the out lap just right, revealing an unusual amount of detail about how the FW47 has to be pushed harder than rivals before commencing a flying lap.

“We were quite comfortably in the top 10 in Q1, and we were quite comfortably in the top 10 in Q2 run one,” he noted.

“And then basically when we came out the garage, we must have been waiting for about two and a half minutes to get out the pit lane.

“And then by the time we got out the pit lane, all the people that came out the pit lane before were on their push laps. So then you do a slow out lap, because you have to let all the cars past who are on the push lap.

“By the time that happens, you go into Turn 1, and the tyres are absolutely nowhere. And you cannot do anything, honestly. We know we’re on the on the back foot in terms of our window to get the tyres to work is narrower than other teams. I think you see that Carlos was struggling in Q1, I was okay in Q1.

“We’ve seen it in in so many tracks we’ve gone to this year so far, if we don’t get our clean out lap, we are nowhere.

“And I think our out lap is normally around this track so far this weekend has been about 10-15 seconds a lap quicker than the people around us. And my Q2 run two out lap was maybe 20-25 seconds slower than my normal out lap. So you can imagine that normally doesn’t go well when you go into Turn 1…”

That requirement for a quick out lap is part of the DNA that is baked into the Williams, and the team has had to work around it all season.

“It doesn’t make it easy for us in many ways,” said Albon. “Obviously I’m angry at the moment. But as a strategist when your window is a bit smaller than everyone else’s to get the clean air and to get the right space on track is very difficult.

“And I feel for us. We basically need to figure out the tyres first. That’s the main issue, and then everything else will come easier. That’s where the frustration is.”

In stark contrast other cars need or can deal with a much slower lap out of the pitlane.

“I think in that moment, it’s basically how versatile are you on your out lap? A team like RB or Aston, for example, their out laps are about 15 seconds a lap slower than hours. So for them, it doesn’t matter.

“They can have the slow exit out of he pit lane and they can have a slow out lap, because it that’s what they do, even on a clear run. That’s not the same for us.

“That’s why you see us a lot of the time go early, for that very reason. I think Mercedes did it in Q2, they went early. And maybe we should have done that.”

All of this makes for some interesting scenarios as drivers jockey for position coming out of the pits.

“Communication is very important,” Albon noted. “You have to be flexible in your run plans. Like I said, the easiest thing is to get the tyres to have a big window, that’s realistically where you can afford to do it.”

“Obviously, this regulation with the minimum delta time and the pit lane thing, this is what it’s come down to.

“And what’s interesting is you’ll actually see some teams purposely letting cars get in front of them, because for them, it’s better to cool the tyres down before they start their out laps.

“But then it just creates chaos! It’s the same for everyone. So I’m not going to complain. I think it’s a valid solution. I think it’s been better doing this than it was from previous years. But it’s the name of the game, and you’ve just got to adapt and get better.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Ferrari still looking for answers after last stint “disaster” for Leclerc in Hungary

Something went wrong on Leclerc’s car in Hungary but the team doesn’t know what

The Hungarian GP had a thrilling conclusion as Oscar Piastri failed to dislodge leader and McLaren team mate Lando Norris, but it could have been even more intriguing had Charles Leclerc still been in contention.

We’ll never know if one or both McLaren drivers would have passed him without a fight had he not been slowed by a still mysterious issue in the last stint of the race that ultimately saw him drop to fourth, behind George Russell.

The Ferrari driver’s frustration was clear on the radio as he appeared to blame the team for the car becoming undriveable, apparently because of what he thought was an “aggressive” wing adjustment at the stop that he didn’t request.

Between getting out of the car and meeting the media he learned that wasn’t the case, and that an unidentified issue had been the cause.

As we know F1 cars can be incredibly sensitive to aero damage – in Hungary Oliver Bearman was forced to stop after he experienced similar symptoms to Leclerc, and afterwards the Haas driver had no explanation as to how any such damage had occurred.

After retrieving Leclerc’s from parc ferme the Ferrari crew found nothing visibly obvious in terms of aero damage that could have been responsible, and still had no answers as of Monday morning.

By chance Ferrari is doing 2026 Pirelli testing in Hungary this week. The team has the option to run the Leclerc chassis and potentially find out if there is a problem with it (or the Hamilton chassis or the spare with race-used LEC parts), although no decision had been made on its plans at the time of writing.

In the immediate aftermath of the race Leclerc was keen to retract some of the radio chatter that hinted at an operational or set-up mistake.

“First of all, I need to take back the words I’ve said in the radio,” he said when I asked him about the radio traffic.

“Because I thought that it was coming from one thing. But then I got a lot more details since I got out the car, and it was actually an issue coming from the chassis, and nothing that we could have done differently.

“I started to feel the issue in lap 40, or something like that. And then it got worse, laps after laps after laps. And towards the end, we were two seconds off the pace, and the car was just undrivable.

“Again, as I repeat myself, but this was an issue, and it’s an outlier. It shouldn’t ever happen again. But, I mean, I’m still very disappointed. We had one opportunity this year to win a race, which I think was this weekend.

“The first stint was perfect. The first laps of the second stint were really good as well. And I think we were in pace to try and win that race. The last stint was a disaster, when I started to have that issue on the chassis.”

When I asked if a kerb or gravel could have triggered something he said: “I don’t know yet how it was caused, but we will look into it.”

He added: “I think it was quite tricky. Otherwise I probably will have known, and they will have told me. Apparently it wasn’t as obvious on data. However, now we can definitely confirm that that there was a problem.”

Leclerc confirmed that he thought a front wing adjustment at the stop was responsible for the change in the behaviour of the car, which was so bad that he knew straight away that victory was likely to slip away.

“When I started to feel the issues, I didn’t really know where that came from. I thought it was from a change we did on the front wing at the pit stop being too aggressive.

“But then, of course, it got a lot worse, and then it seemed a bit off to me, but when I first felt the very strange behaviour of the car, I was okay, if this is staying, it’s going to slip away from us.

“It wasn’t very consistent, but yeah, basically every corner, it was doing something different.”

After the race team boss Fred Vasseur had no theories about what had gone wrong.

“Honestly, the situation was quite strange,” said the Frenchman. “We were under control the first 40 laps of the race, we are very in control the first stint, a bit more difficult the second one, but it was still manageable. And last stint, was a disaster, very difficult to drive, the balance was not there.

“And honestly, we don’t know exactly what’s happened so far. It means that we have to investigate something broken on the chassis side, or whatever. But it was at one stage I thought that we will never finish the race, we can be lucky in this situation to score points of a P4.

“It’s really frustrating for us, because that I think we did the first pole position of the season. The first two stints went pretty well, and we lost completely the pace and the path of the weekend.

He continued: “The first lap of the last stint, he lost something like one second at one stage and perhaps the message that also you interpret.

“He asked us if we didn’t do a mistake on the front wing, and adjust the front wing, but [we didn’t]. And we lost completely the pace, and then perhaps a bit snowball effect, but at the end of the day that I think from 38 to 43 we lost at least eight-tenths.”

For Leclerc it turned into one of those nightmare days, and in the course of his defence against George Russell he picked up a 5-second penalty for erratic driving.

It didn’t make any difference to his safe P4, but the penalty point was probably annoying.

“I knew I was on the limit,” he conceded. “I don’t have much opinion about it. I felt like I moved before braking and then I braked, obviously angling my car towards the apex, which is normally what I do, but I can imagine George being quite vocal on the radio. It’s normally the case.

“I don’t mind, especially on a race like this. If there was a safety car at the end of the race and I would have taken a five second penalty, I probably would have been a lot more frustrated. But it wasn’t the case.”

For Leclerc the real frustration was that this was the first opportunity in 2026 for Ferrari to win a full-length race, and while there are some tracks coming in the second half of the year that historically have been good for the Maranello outift, McLaren is going to be hard to beat everywhere.

“I think they are the strongest team out there,” he said. “And even today, they were very, very fast. I think on a track like this, what gave me hope of winning is that we were starting first, and with the dirty air, it’s a struggle to get past. I think Oscar had probably a bit more place than me, but couldn’t overtake.

“So I don’t think we are going into the second half of the season thinking that we can win anywhere.

“And that’s what makes the frustration even bigger, because we knew that this was one opportunity, probably over the season, and we had to take it. But unfortunately, with this issue, we couldn’t do much.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

How Hungary 2024 taught McLaren valuable lessons

12 months on the team is better equipped to deal with tricky situations

A year ago McLaren was just starting to emerge as the team to beat, which meant that race wins were sup for grabs for Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri.

In Hungary the team faced its biggest challenge up to that point in terms of balancing the interests of its two drivers.

What looked like a smart strategy call intended to maximise the team’s overall result became a little complicated when it reversed the positions and put Norris ahead of Piastri.

When Norris was told to let his team mate back past he was reluctant to do so, and while he eventually did follow instructions the episode somewhat overshadowed the Australian’s first victory.

Twelve months on and the team has been through a few more difficult situations, and each one has been something of a learning exercise, and potentially added layers to the Papaya Rules.

And given that the title is at stake and each race becomes more important as the number of points available reduces, we can guess that there could be further awkward scenarios yet to come.

However the team is now much better equipped now to deal with such eventualities, as Andrea Stella confirmed when I asked him about the subject.

“It was one year ago,” said the Italian. “To me, it looks like it was 10 years ago in terms of how much has happened from a racing point of view, how much has happened in terms of the rate of development of the team, or growth of the team, in the way the results that we have been able to achieve since then.

“But as part of this journey, there’s also a journey that has to do with the improving our way of going racing, what we call the racing approach.

“We have reviewed extensively one year ago, the race here in Hungary, and then we kept this diligent, rigorous approach to reviewing and learning, and we have as much as possible, formalised everything that we learned into our racing approach.

“And the thing that makes me most proud is that Lando and Oscar have always contributed very genuinely, very honestly, very transparently, just bringing their values into the way we go racing. So we’ve gone a long way. I think we have established a pretty robust platform in terms of how we go racing.”

He knows that it could get stressful in the coming weeks: “We are going to be challenged, because racing in F1 is difficult, but so far, and for the remainder of the season, I’m really proud and happy with what, with the way we’ve been going racing, and with the way in which Lando and Oscar have sustained the journey of the team.”

The team may have missed pole in Hungary, but Stella remains confident that the team has a strong package for the remainder of the season.

He points out that in contrast to the recent past – when the team tended to bundle upgrades together and bring them in one hit – this season there’s been more of a drip feed of performance items.

“We have seen a very positive trend in terms of our competitiveness, especially, I would say over the last three events in which we have finished P1/P2.

“This is not only because we started with a competitive car, but actually we have upgraded the car since Canada with what was in the past a single instalment upgrade. So it would have been very noticeable – McLaren bring a new car and improves by a few tenths of a second.

“But in the recent races, we have upgraded the car with some parts at pretty much each race, so we have become faster. I think here, the Hungaroring, despite the result in Q3 has actually proven that the car is fast.

“I think every single session we were P1/P2 by a decent chunk compared to the next team. This makes us very positive about the reminder of the season.

“We look forward to starting racing again after the shutdown. I think we have some tracks that will be favourable to us again, like Zandvoort, and we have also done some specific work for some tracks like Monza or Vegas in which, not necessarily last year we were dominant, and we knew that we needed to do some work for the performance at low drag.

“So we definitely look forward to the second part of the season, and we expect to be competitive.”

As for this weekend, Stella says the tricky conditions contributed to a cautious approach by his drivers, neither of whom could afford to make a mistake that dropped them down the order. Charles Leclerc in contract had nothing to lose and took his chance in style.

“I think it’s an interesting qualifying in terms of understanding how things go for an F1 car, because definitely we had a significant change of conditions. You can see in the meteo data a change in terms of wind direction, wind intensity, temperature, humidity, everything changed.

“And everyone from Q2 up until when we were pretty competitive, we put together definitely strong laps, from Q2 to Q3, everyone went slower. We went slower by about half a second in average.

“Actually, we simulated the change of conditions in our simulations, and it gives a little bit less than that, but about four-tenths of a second. But Ferrari and Leclerc managed to go actually faster. So the track was definitely slower.

“I think for Lando and Oscar, after they had seen in the first run that conditions had changed, that the grip wasn’t what they expected, that every corner was going to be a bit unpredictable, therefore, the lap time didn’t come.

“I think in the second set, they needed to be a bit cautious, because obviously, when you race for the championship, you want to make sure that you are there. I think this is a slightly different approach for Charles. I think it just went, went for it, like, I don’t think I have much to lose here.

“And it paid off. And this is a credit and merit to a very good execution by Ferrari and Charles.”

The conditions in Hungary were very specific, but Stella paints an interesting scenario.

What about the next time we get a rain-affected session, or places like Baku and Singapore, where there is very little margin for error? As their battle gets tighter will Norris and Piastri again leave a few vital hundredths on the table as they ensure that they don’t mess up that crucial last lap in Q3 – and potentially allow others to sneak ahead? It will be interesting to see how it plays out.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

How a frustrated Verstappen was left “driving on ice” as Red Bull struggles in Hungary

Verstappen could manage only eighth on the Hungarian GP grid

For Max Verstappen the Hungarian GP weekend has been something of a nightmare this far, and his car was sliding so much that at one point in qualifying he said it was like driving on ice even on his out lap.

In the end he was almost relieved to have made it into Q3 and earned P8 – albeit with a couple of Aston Martins and a Sauber ahead.

Had Lewis Hamilton and Kimi Antonelli qualified where their cars should in reality have been, Verstappen would indeed have been edged out of the top 10.

In fact over the three practice sessions he was ninth, 14th and 12th – not where you would usually expect him to be.

“I mean, looking at the whole weekend, I think we are happy to be in Q3 because I’ve been more outside of the top 10 than,” he said when I asked him about qualifying.

“It’s been difficult. The whole weekend no grip, front and rear, and it was the same in qualifying. So for me, it was not really a shock. I just drove to what I already feel the whole weekend.”

He admitted that the team didn’t know what the issue was: “No, clearly not, otherwise, of course, we would have changed it already. But somehow, this weekend, nothing seems to work.”

Verstappen acknowledged that RBR also had a difficult Hungary last year, although not to quite the same degree.

“I think we still qualified very close to pole, like within a few hundredths, so I think we were a lot more competitive back then. But yeah, this weekend already, from lap one, it just fell off, and we threw the car around a lot, and nothing really gave a direction.

“And that of course is the biggest problem, because normally, when you use or you change a lot on the side of it will always give you positives or negatives, and now just nothing works.

“It’s like just going around in circles, and nothing gave you any kind of idea of what to do.”

He added: “There’s not been a single lap or a single corner that I felt good. So the whole weekend so far, it’s just been sliding.”

That sliding won’t help his tyres in race conditions. Normally you would expect an out-of-position Verstappen to make progress, but it could turn into a rear guard action.

“There may be a car a few cars in front of me that I can maybe battle with a little bit. But of course, also Lewis is still a bit further down the road, which I think he shouldn’t be there, right? So he will come through a bit.”

So is this the worst weekend he can recall over the past couple of seasons?

“I mean, we have had a few Singapore disasters. So yeah, I mean, it’s just not been a good one for sure…”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

How Norris learned that sometimes 95% is “good enough” to get the job done

Norris accepts that at times this year he’s pushed too hard

Not for the first time in 2025 Lando Norris heads into a race weekend keen to make amends for disappointment at the previous event, and with an urgent need to claw back some points in his fight with Oscar Piastri.

The Belgian GP was even more frustrating in that he did the difficult bit and beat his McLaren team mate to pole, only to lose out on the first lap to a combination of driving and technical issues.

Despite his best efforts on an alternative strategy with hard tyres he had to settle for second, losing another seven points to his rival.

Once again there followed a few days of soul-searching and discussions with the team and what he could have done differently or better.

“There’s hindsight of certain things,” he said when I asked if any lessons had been learned. “Nothing which means I would have won the race. There’s also things he probably could have done better too.

“So even if I had a mega last corner or mega Turn 1, still a pretty good chance he would have passed me anyway. So sometimes you’ve just got to accept that. As much as I would like to win them all, you can’t. A tough one to take, because I did a bad job.”

Norris stressed it wasn’t just down to him not getting it right as the first guy in line on the wet track.

“I didn’t have the best run, but at the same time then we had some, not problems, some let’s say incorrect settings with the battery, which meant he had a slight advantage of battery comparing to me, which certainly didn’t help.

“But I also didn’t do the best two corners. Whether that would have made a difference or not, hard to say. With the issue he probably would have passed me, no matter what. So yeah, a tougher one to take from that perspective.

“From the strategy and pit stops, tough to say. I don’t think a double stack would have been any better. I just had a slow pit stop. It was more the slow pit stop, and it was one of my lock ups in Turn 1, which cost me over a second and a bit. You put those two things together, it’s like four seconds of race time.

“So there’s things I could have done better, and then we as team and team could have done better, and that’s what we will try and work on.”

Spa underlined just how tight the battle between the two team mates is. There’s no margin for either to put a foot wrong over the course of a race weekend.

“I think it’s probably down to the least mistakes, I would say, more than anything,” he noted. “Not necessarily who is outright the quickest, or who can simply race better or make the best overtakes.

“I have some of my strengths, he has some of his, and it’s more down to the least mistakes. Especially because of the position we’re in as a team, we have a car that is you can say one of the best cars made in F1, and we’re first or we’re second more often than more not.

“And therefore it’s just kind of more between us, more than who qualifies first and sixth. We qualify first and second more often, and you can kind of just hold on in Turn 1, and then go from there.

“There’s not been many races where positions have swapped through a race, so therefore it’s more who can then make the least mistakes from that point next onwards.”

Asked if he had to drive at 100 percent to win the World Championship, or had learned that 99.8 might be enough, he made an interesting comment.

“I try and perform at 101 percent,” he said. “Sometimes that’s amazing. Sometimes that’s, I think, as good as you can get. And that’s what I feel is the optimum of what I and what I think a driver can achieve at times, and I do believe that.

“But also times I should drive at 95 or even 90 percent and that’s still enough to be on pole or P2 sometimes. I do regret trying to be so good at beginning part of the season, and now already I sometimes just settle for a 95 percent lap. And that’s that’s still good enough.”

Norris made huge strides last season as he experienced a winning car for the first time and found himself battling with the likes of Max Verstappen, as well as Piastri.

That process has continued this year, although his struggles to come to terms with the MCL39 have had an impact.

“There’s just always different situations, different moments along the way,” he said. “I think as a driver, I still feel better than I was. Doesn’t mean I always do a better job, because the car is quite different this year.

“I’ve had my tricky moments with the car and understanding how to drive it, just because, yes, it’s a McLaren, it’s got papaya on it, but it handles pretty differently to how it’s done in previous years. So I’ve had to just adapt to that, and it’s not suited me as well.

“But it’s just tough, and I’ve got to do what I’ve had to do, and I’ve needed to do a better job to get back to being as quick as I need to be, which I feel like I’ve done, and I’ve improved on.

“So I think [I’ve shown] my ability to improve on worst moments as a proof, or ability to improve on certain struggles that you might achieve during a weekend, or over a session or practice, whatever it is.

“Other than that, I think there’s just always going to be for everyone little things along the way that’s a new experience, or you didn’t expect, that you wish you could be better on. But I think that’s just life.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized