Booth and Lowdon set to leave Manor F1 team

It’s understood that both John Booth and Graeme Lowdon have resigned from the Manor F1 team.

There has been no confirmation from the team, and both men are still working in Mexico this weekend and will stay until the end of the season.

It’s believed that the pair have lost faith in the ability of current owner Stephen Fitzpatrick and his business partner Abdulla Boulsien to keep the team alive long term.

While the team has created a potentially attractive package by signing contracts with Mercedes and Williams (for gearboxes and other technology) the financial future remains uncertain.

Aside from the $50m of ‘Bernie money’ there has been very little investment from Fitzpatrick this year. Meanwhile the owners have turned down offers from at least two new investors – sources suggest figures of $50m and $40m respectively – presumably on the basis that they can hold out for more.

Given that most of the staff have long links with Manor and have stayed loyal to the current management it remains to be seen how many will opt to stay on.

6 Comments

Filed under F1, F1 News, Grand Prix News

Nico Rosberg: Wind caused mistake in US GP

Nico Rosberg says that Mercedes has determined that a strong gust of wind triggered his off track incident in the closing stages of the US GP.

Rosberg lost the lead and this any chance of keeping the title battle open until Mexico.

“It was gust of wind, a big one,” he said. “I’m serious! But everybody has it, and so you can’t really use it as an excuse, It’s still a mistake, but I understand my mistake now, and that’s important, for me to understand it. It was a very unusual scenario which happened only once in all those laps. I understand the mistake and that helps me a lot moving forward. I lost a lot of rear downforce as a result.”

Asked if he hoped the team might not focus on getting him second place he said: “I don’t think it’s going to be such a clear change, it’s still going to be fighting for the win out there, OK, the constructors’ is done, the drivers’ is done. I want to win, I’m sure Lewis wants to win, Vettel wants to win, so I think it’s going to be a battle pretty much as usual, I don’t think it’s going to change much.”

Meanwhile the German didn’t want to talk about how he would adjust his approach after the first corner incident with Lewis Hamilton, or the team’s plan to get the two of them together.

“Sorry I’m not going to go into details about what my approach is going to be or if I’m going to think about my approach or not. It’s not the place to do that.

“The discussion still remains to take place, it’s not happened yet. I don’t want to say every single detail, so let’s see.”

Asked I he needed to get the gloves off he repeated: “Sorry I’m not going into those details. I’ll leave it up to you to make your opinion.”

8 Comments

Filed under F1, F1 News, Grand Prix News

Bumpy track triggered Williams failures in Austin

Williams believes it can find a solution to the unexpected suspension problem that caused both Valtteri Bottas and Felipe Massa in Austin.

Bottas suffered a failure of the centrally-located rear inertia damper, or i-Damper, in Sunday morning qualifying, and in the race both drivers suffered repeats. The problem only emerged on race day as the drivers did more laps, and at higher speeds.

“There’s a really, really severe bump in Turn 11,” Rob Smedley told this writer. “Which is caused by the track subsiding over the last two years. As the car went over there the i-Damper saw a very high impact load, and basically locked up. It was massively severe, double the severity of anything else we see.

“Once we had Valtteri’s go again in the race, we spoke to the drivers about whether or not you could stay to the left or the right, but it was across the whole track. There was nowhere to go, so either you had to stop the car at that point or wait for it to fail on Massa’s car, which it did.”

Although the Austin bump was an extreme case the team is not taking any chances, especially given that Mexico is a new track.

“First of all you have to understand the problem, we’ve done that, we know exactly what the problem was, and we’ve got a series of measures in place. We’ll be running through those tomorrow in free practice, and seeing what is necessary and what is not around here.

“We’ve had a look at the design itself. Whatever is necessary from a reliability point of view, and whatever isn’t we won’t, because we don’t want to give away performance unnecessarily. There are a few ways to approach the problem to find a solution.”

In effect Williams has a beefed-up component that is potentially more reliable, but could cost lap time: “Something like that, and also in the actual settings of the car. It’s perhaps the way the suspension settings themselves and the way we run, the heave stiffness and the normal viscous damping levels that we run.”

Leave a comment

Filed under F1, F1 News, Grand Prix News

Mackenzie denies Ecclestone’s claim that CVC has to sell F1 stake

CVC boss Donald Mackenzie has denied Bernie Ecclestone’s regular assertion that F1’s major stakeholder is obliged to sell its stake soon.

Ecclestone said recently that something could happen before the end of this year, with US firm RSE Ventures the entity most closely linked with the sale, in a partnership with Chinese investors.

“No, we’re not obliged to sell,” Mackenzie told this blog. “It’s unlikely that we’ll be here forever, but we’re definitely not obliged to sell. Bernie often says things he doesn’t mean…”

Meanwhile Mackenzie said that the spectacular US GP demonstrated that the sport can still put on a great show when the circumstances are right. Inevitably the recent dominance of Mercedes has put F1 in a negative light in the eyes of many observers, but the US GP did much to redress the balance.

“It was brilliant, wasn’t it? It often happens when it rains. I was pleased for Lewis, and also for the fans. I came from England, I was worried about coming all this way and it not happening! So it was great that it came off, and it was a brilliant race.

“And it also shows you that with the right ingredients, F1 is still fantastic. Close racing. You saw that the Red Bulls with less power and more grip were right up the front, until the slicks came on.”

Mackenzie is also a keen supporter of Ecclestone’s push for a budget twin-turbo V6, which was formally announced this week.

“I know Bernie would like an alternative to the big two. The current situation isn’t that healthy. If we can go to a good alternative engine at the right price, we’ll be very pleased.”

5 Comments

Filed under F1, F1 News, Grand Prix News

Ecclestone says he feels sorry for US fans after wet weekend

Bernie Ecclestone says he feels sorry for the US GP spectators whose weekend was spoiled by the weather.

The F1 boss admitted that he was relieved that the race was finally run, as at some points during the weekend there were doubts about it. On Saturday fans were locked out while FP3 took place.

“It was good wasn’t it?,” Ecclestone told this writer after the race. “When you think about it, if we had talked about this on Friday, we wouldn’t have been so excited. Really, this morning it may have been that we couldn’t have had a race.

“So everything was good in the end. I think everybody enjoyed it, it was a good race, and the result was a big question mark right until the end.”

Regarding the fans he said: “Everything was pity yesterday with the rain, everybody suffered. I feel sorry for the spectators, but there’s not much we can do about it.”

3 Comments

Filed under F1, F1 News, Grand Prix News

Gentlemen, start your (alternative) engines as Todt and Bernie take on manufacturers

The FIA has formally announced its proposal for a low budget “client” engine to be introduced in 2017, which means that F1 could run with two different types of power unit which will somehow have to be balanced by an equivalency formula.

As previously explained it would allow teams to have a much cheaper alternative to the manufacturer supplied hybrid V6s. Although the specification has not been confirmed the FIA wants to have a 2.2-litre twin turbo V6, which in essence is similar to the current Indycar engine. The FIA is planning to launch a tender process, to which the likes of Cosworth and Ilmor could respond.

Today’s announcement is a direct result of a recent meeting between the engine manufacturers are the FIA in Geneva where the subject of a cap on supply costs to customers was discussed again, following a unanimous agreement at the last strategy group meeting that such a plan would be imposed.

However Ferrari used the veto on rule changes which was given to them by the FIA many years ago. The FIA, with the full support of Ecclestone, has used that rejection of a cut in supply costs to find a way to introduce the new engine concept. For Bernie Ecclestone one of the primary motivations is to find an engine that Red Bull could use in 2017 that has no manufacturer strings attached.

In a highly unusual move the FIA has gone public on the Ferrari veto.

The governing body said today: “The FIA, in agreement with FOM, suggested the principle of setting a maximum price for engine and gear box for client teams at the last Strategy Group meeting These measures were put to the vote and adopted with a large majority.

However, Ferrari SpA decided to go against this and exercise the right of veto long recognised under agreements governing F1. In the interest of the Championship, the FIA has decided not to legally challenge Ferrari SpA’s use of its right of veto.”

In explaining what happens next the FIA used very careful language to emphasise that this is an idea that has to go through the proper processes: “Therefore the FIA will initiate a consultation with all stakeholders regarding the possible introduction of a client engine, which will be available as of 2017. Following this consultation a call for tenders for this client engine, the cost of which would be much lower than the current power unit, could be undertaken.

Supported by FOM, the FIA will continue in its efforts to ensure the sustained long-term development of the Championship and look for solutions enabling it to achieve this. It asks all of the teams to make a positive contribution to the success of this approach through proposals and initiatives in the interest of the Championship and its continuation over the long term.”

Ecclestone is fully behind the idea and is convinced it will work.

We used to have people running turbo engine and people running normally aspirated,” he said in Austin. “It wasn’t a two-tier system. It was a choice. Whatever it is, I anticipate they will be able to continue running their engine and others running the other engine.”

Regarding equivalency he said: “Obviously it can be done, yes. Maybe we will have refuelling again for those that want it, if people have an engine that is super efficient they won’t wan to obviously. They don’t have to.”

The existing manufacturers are obviously sceptical about the idea, and it remains to be seen whether ultimately the scheme is a ploy to force them to lower the supply prices of their current engines.

13 Comments

Filed under F1, F1 News, Grand Prix News

Toto Wolff: “They are enemies in the same team…”

Toto Wolff admits that the first corner clash in Austin between Lewis Hamilton and Nico Rosberg will lead to a discussion with the two drivers in order to calm the situation.

The incident followed a similar one in Suzuka, where Rosberg was edged wide and lost momentum.

“Lewis came on the radio and said it wasn’t on purpose,” said Wolff when asked by this writer. “I think it’s something we are going to talk about in a couple of days, but this is a moment to celebrate a World Champion who deserves to be World Champion, and then once emotions have cooled down, we should discuss.

“It’s clear that a racing driver who has just lost a World Championship for a second time against his team mate in a tough race where certainly Turn One wasn’t very nice, and he lost it by his own mistake. I think we have to respect for that.”

Wolff admitted that the last three races will have a different feel given that both titles are won.

“Flat out! Actually, we have been unleashing them all the time already. I don’t know, I have never been in that comfortable situation of being able to sit in a race and enjoy it like a fan, watch it. But then it’s also a crucial moment now to make sure that today’s race won’t release consequences within the team, and splitting the two sides of the garage.

“Celebrate the World Champion, let a couple of days pass, emotion cool down, have a chat. It’s never easy, it wasn’t easy the first time around. I think we’ve gained some experience, I’ve gained some experience, I’ve been around a little while now, and I just need to have a calm approach, but a firm approach, about how we would like them to compete out there.”

Asked if Rosberg would eventually be happy for Lewis he said: “That’s never going to happen. They are enemies in the same team. It’s clear that we cannot expect him to cheer up in such a situation.”

23 Comments

Filed under F1, F1 News, Grand Prix News

Lewis Hamilton: ““For any driver I think it’s the pinnacle…”

Lewis Hamilton says the closing laps of the US GP were a “defining moment” as he headed towards his third World Championship.

Hamilton was behind team mate Nico Rosberg at a safety car restart with 10 laps to go, and knew that if he could get past, he would win the title today. In the end Rosberg made the job easy by running wide and leaving the door open.

The race had started with some controversy as Lewis leaned on his team mate and pushed him wide at Turn One.

The last 10 –15 laps were the tough ones,” he said. “What an extraordinary race. I just started out well, very, very close obviously with Nico at the beginning and that wasn’t intentional, we both broke very deep into it, and I understood he was on the outside and in the wet that’s where the grip is, so he was turning and I wasn’t turning so we touched.

After that just fighting for position, trying to stay ahead. Emotions were just up and down through the race because at one point I was in the lead but I knew I didn’t have it in the car. I was struggling and sliding all over the place and then I fell to fourth and the track was drying and just the most… the trickiest conditions for us.

And then, as I said, the last 10 laps really… I was behind the Safety Car and thinking, ‘OK, I’ve got 10 laps, the World Championship is right there – how am I going to get it?’. And then I was just head down, everything that I’ve got from all these years. Everything that I’ve built up, everything that I’ve learnt comes into this. This is the defining moment really.

Of course I could have gone on to other races but for me, I’m kind of like ‘now!’ It’s so close that I could smell it.”

Lewis made it clear that his third title means a lot to him.

For any driver I think it’s the pinnacle. There’s no further you can go. Your ultimate goal is to win in everything you compete in. It’s to perform at your best and hopefully better than everyone else, so when you do win a world championship it signifies at that particular time your greatness and the people around you. The whole unit. The teamwork. The greatness of that partnership as well.

“I remember when I got my first one. I was just grateful for the first one. I told Ron [Dennis] when I was 10 that I wanted to be world champion in his car and it’s kinda crazy to think that ten years after he signed me I was.”

3 Comments

Filed under F1, F1 News, Grand Prix News

Ecclestone: Honda wants to supply Red Bull but Dennis is blocking it

Bernie Ecclestone says that Honda wants to supply Red Bull in 2016 – but Ron Dennis is blocking the deal from happening.

Ecclestone added that he and the FIA agreed with Honda that they would expand to two teams in their second year. However, McLaren has a veto on the identity of who that team might be.

The honest answer at the moment it would appear that Honda are happy to give them an engine and Mr Dennis thinks they shouldn’t,” said Ecclestone. “Although Honda have got an agreement with the FIA and myself that they would allow them into F1 to supply to engines to one team for first year, two teams second and three teams the third.

And they somehow got involved and made a commitment to Ron that he had a veto on any engines, and he doesn’t want Red Bull. He doesn’t want them. I think he believes they may be competitors.”

Asked how McLaren could have a veto given the Honda/FIA agreement he said: “In fairness to Ron, he probably didn’t know. I am not blaming anybody. They are the facts.

At the time when they came in the FIA said if we let you into F1 you have to supply three teams, they said as we are brand new into F1 we don’t think we can do that. We supply one team for the first year and after that, second and third year.”

Ecclestone was non-committal on whether or not the deal would go through.

I don’t know…Ron has said definitely not. As far as he is concerned, so I don’t know if his veto will stand up.

They can only run Honda if Honda agreed and they won’t agree obviously and have an argument with Ron, because Ron will suit them.”

Asked if Honda would really represent competitive engine that Dietrich Mateschitz wants he said: “At the moment… But you don’t know what next year’s Honda is going to be.”

11 Comments

Filed under F1, F1 News, Grand Prix News

FIA takes on manufacturers as it launches tender for low-budget V6

An alternative ‘spec’ engine package for F1 looks likely to become a reality as Bernie Ecclestone and Jean Todt are pushing the concept of low budget engine for 2017 – one that would literally take the power away from the manufacturers.

Both men have become increasingly concerned at the influence wielded by the engine suppliers. Sources suggest that the FIA will could launch a tender process for a 2.2-litre turbo turbo V6, similar to the current Indycar engine, as soon as next week. How an equivalency formula would be worked out remains to be seen.

The news comes after the idea receiving no support at the meeting of the sport’s engine manufacturers in Geneva last week. However the manufacturers also rejected any kind of cost cap on their current engine supply deals, and has prompted prompted the FIA to act. It remains to seen if the concept is ultimately being used as a bargaining chip to bring those costs down.

Ecclestone has long been pushing for a way to find a “Cosworth” who can supply a budget engine to struggling teams, and Todt is also sympathetic to the idea of a low cost package. It could be forced through for 2017 without unanimous support.

In April when I asked Ecclestone about a twin-turbo V6 he told me: “I never wanted to go back to V8s, I wanted to set up a single engine to be in F1, which they could run for let’s say 10% of what these manufacturers spend. It would be a different regulation, which would be cheaper. If the manufacturers then decide this would be a good thing, then that’s OK. Or if they want to supply [current] engines at a realistic price to the teams, then good.”

Asked about how two types of engine could compete in parallel he said: “We used to run turbos with normally aspirated engines before. You can do either.”

A return to V8s or a move to a twin-turbo V6 with a basic KERS package has also been mentioned as a last ditch alternative for Red Bull to use in 2016, although it would require unanimous support for a rule change.

Longer term the turbo idea was always more likely to fly than a return to V8s, as it would represent less of a loss of face for the FIA and those who have been pushing the new technology.

Red Bull boss Christian Horner remains open to the idea of an alternative, and he also favours a turbo route rather than a move to older technology, as he indicated today when asked about the prospect of a return to V8s.

“We might have to because we don’t have an engine!,” he joked. “I think if you look at what the plus points of the V8 were, the sound was the obvious one for the fans. It was quite simple technology compared to what we have now, so the costs were quite significantly lower.

“But the machinery that we have now through the regulations, they’re incredible bits of equipment, and I think what we need to do rather than look backwards look forwards to what should the engine developed be for the future. There’s elements of what we have that are strong at the moment that can be improved, and I would certainly love to see the volume go back up, and certainly the cost of development come down.”

Inevitably these representing manufacturers are happy with the status quo, and don’t want to see any kind of dumbing down of F1 technology.

“Honda joined the sport because of the challenge of the technology,” said Eric Boullier. “And obviously some may regret the engine noise of the V8, some may regret the cost as well, but it’s true that we have to look forward. It’s a piece of technology that’s brilliant, once it works, in our case hopefully soon, it’s a nice challenge to run these engines.”

My April story can be found here: https://adamcooperf1.com/2015/04/23/ecclestone-believes-teams-can-run-cheap-engines-in-2017/

6 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized